Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey

Claude M. Setodji*, John Devin Peipert, Ron D. Hays

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: End-stage renal disease patients’ experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS®) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups. Methods: The ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist’s communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis. Results: The three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients’ experience. Conclusions: The ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients’ experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalQuality of Life Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Renal Dialysis
Health Personnel
Quality of Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Dialysis
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Social Responsibility
Quality Improvement
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychometrics
Health Status
Chronic Kidney Failure
Patient Care
Mental Health
Communication

Keywords

  • CAHPS In-Center Hemodialysis (ICH) Survey
  • Differential item functioning
  • Health care disparities
  • Item response theory
  • Measurement equivalence
  • Patient experiences of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{9948afc6184648488111e557c0c709c8,
title = "Differential item functioning of the CAHPS{\circledR} In-Center Hemodialysis Survey",
abstract = "Purpose: End-stage renal disease patients’ experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS{\circledR}) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups. Methods: The ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist’s communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis. Results: The three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients’ experience. Conclusions: The ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients’ experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.",
keywords = "CAHPS In-Center Hemodialysis (ICH) Survey, Differential item functioning, Health care disparities, Item response theory, Measurement equivalence, Patient experiences of care",
author = "Setodji, {Claude M.} and Peipert, {John Devin} and Hays, {Ron D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey. / Setodji, Claude M.; Peipert, John Devin; Hays, Ron D.

In: Quality of Life Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey

AU - Setodji, Claude M.

AU - Peipert, John Devin

AU - Hays, Ron D.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: End-stage renal disease patients’ experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS®) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups. Methods: The ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist’s communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis. Results: The three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients’ experience. Conclusions: The ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients’ experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.

AB - Purpose: End-stage renal disease patients’ experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS®) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups. Methods: The ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist’s communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis. Results: The three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients’ experience. Conclusions: The ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients’ experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.

KW - CAHPS In-Center Hemodialysis (ICH) Survey

KW - Differential item functioning

KW - Health care disparities

KW - Item response theory

KW - Measurement equivalence

KW - Patient experiences of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069826431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069826431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5

DO - 10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5

M3 - Article

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

ER -