TY - JOUR
T1 - Diffusion of agricultural information within social networks
T2 - Evidence on gender inequalities from Mali
AU - Beaman, Lori A
AU - Dillon, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge financial support for fieldwork from the German Development Ministry (BMZ), International Food Policy Research Institute , Millennium Challenge Corporation , Millennium Challenge Account-Mali , and Northwestern University's Institute for Policy Research . We thank Sam Arenberg, Gabriel Lawin, Aissatou Ouedraogo, and Loic Watine for superb research assistance. Seminar participants at the University of Illinois-Champaign and Ohio State University, two anonymous reviewers, Agnes Quisumbing, and Maria Porter are acknowledged without implication for their helpful comments. The authors can be contacted at l-beaman@northwestern.edu and dillona6@msu.edu .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Social networks are an important mechanism for diffusing information when institutions are missing, but there may be distributional consequences from targeting only central nodes in a network. After implementing a social network census, one of three village-level treatments determined which treated nodes in the village received information about composting: random assignment, nodes with the highest degree, or nodes with high betweenness. We then look at how information diffuses through the network. We find information diffusion declines with social distance, suggesting frictions in the diffusion of information. Aggregate knowledge about the technology did not differ across targeting strategies, but targeting nodes using betweenness measures in village-level networks excludes less-connected nodes from new information. Women farmers are less likely to receive information when betweenness centrality is used in targeting, suggesting there are important gender differences, not only in the relationship between social distance and diffusion, but also in the social learning process.
AB - Social networks are an important mechanism for diffusing information when institutions are missing, but there may be distributional consequences from targeting only central nodes in a network. After implementing a social network census, one of three village-level treatments determined which treated nodes in the village received information about composting: random assignment, nodes with the highest degree, or nodes with high betweenness. We then look at how information diffuses through the network. We find information diffusion declines with social distance, suggesting frictions in the diffusion of information. Aggregate knowledge about the technology did not differ across targeting strategies, but targeting nodes using betweenness measures in village-level networks excludes less-connected nodes from new information. Women farmers are less likely to receive information when betweenness centrality is used in targeting, suggesting there are important gender differences, not only in the relationship between social distance and diffusion, but also in the social learning process.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Gender
KW - Information diffusion
KW - Social networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042666448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042666448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.01.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042666448
SN - 0304-3878
VL - 133
SP - 147
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Development Economics
JF - Journal of Development Economics
ER -