Directiness and deference in pharmacy students' messages to physicians

Bruce L. Lambert*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The profession of pharmacy is in the midst of an attempted role expansion. Advocates of a philosophy of practice known as pharmaceutical care want to expand the traditional role of the pharmacist to include patient counseling, drug use monitoring, clinical consultation with physicians, and responsibility for patient outcomes. Other health professions are resisting this role expansion, and it has proven difficult to socialize students into a professional role that is not yet widely accepted. To better prepare students for the workplace, pharmacy educators need a way of assessing the extent to which students have accepted and begun to enact the expanded clinical role. Since role and identity disputes are negotiated in routine interactions between pharmacists and other health professionals, an assessment tool was devised to mimic a common interprofessional interaction. Written messages to physicians were gathered from pharmacy students in response to a hypothetical drug allergy scenario. Pharmacist-physician communication is especially problematic because many of the acts pharmacists routinely perform (e.g. correcting, reminding, reporting, etc.) are intrinsically threatening to a physician's professional identity and sense of self worth. Brown and Levinson's politeness theory explains how situational factors influence peoples' choices in dealing with such identity threatening acts. As an act becomes more threatening, the degree of politeness accompanying the act also increases. Detailed content analysis of pharmacy students' messages to physicians determined that allergy reports were more likely to be made directly than alternative drug recommendations. Recommendations were more likely than reports to be omitted entirely. Implications for pharmacy students' emerging professional identities are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)545-555
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1995

Funding

Acknowledgements--The author wishes to thank Dr Jeann Lee for her assistance in segmenting and coding the drug allergy messages. Drs Barbara O'Keefe and Barbara Sharf provided helpful commentary on an earlier draft, as did an anonymous reviewer. This project was funded in part by a New Investigator Award from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, supported by the American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Keywords

  • clinical pharmacy
  • professional socialization
  • role expansion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Directiness and deference in pharmacy students' messages to physicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this