Discordance of DNA methylation variance between two accessible human tissues

Ruiwei Jiang, Meaghan J. Jones, Edith Chen, Sarah M. Neumann, Hunter B. Fraser, Gregory E. Miller*, Michael S. Kobor

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Population epigenetic studies have been seeking to identify differences in DNA methylation between specific exposures, demographic factors, or diseases in accessible tissues, but relatively little is known about how inter-individual variability differs between these tissues. This study presents an analysis of DNA methylation differences between matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and buccal epithelial cells (BECs), the two most accessible tissues for population studies, in 998 promoter-located CpG sites. Specifically we compared probe-wise DNA methylation variance, and how this variance related to demographic factors across the two tissues. PBMCs had overall higher DNA methylation than BECs, and the two tissues tended to differ most at genomic regions of low CpG density. Furthermore, although both tissues showed appreciable probe-wise variability, the specific regions and magnitude of variability differed strongly between tissues. Lastly, through exploratory association analysis, we found indication of differential association of BEC and PBMC with demographic variables. The work presented here offers insight into variability of DNA methylation between individuals and across tissues and helps guide decisions on the suitability of buccal epithelial or peripheral mononuclear cells for the biological questions explored by epigenetic studies in human populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8257
Pages (from-to)8257
Number of pages1
JournalScientific reports
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discordance of DNA methylation variance between two accessible human tissues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this