TY - JOUR
T1 - Distilling the Key Elements of Pediatric Appendicitis Clinical Practice Guidelines
AU - Ingram, Martha Conley
AU - Harris, Courtney J.
AU - Studer, Abbey
AU - Martin, Sarah
AU - Berman, Loren
AU - Alder, Adam
AU - Raval, Mehul V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number TL1TR001423 (author supported: Martha-Conley Ingram). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Otherwise, the authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: Use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been shown to reduce care delays, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient outcomes. We conducted a systematized review to identify key elements that should be included in an evidence-based CPG for pediatric appendicitis. Methods: We characterized key decision points and content areas from CPGs developed from 2000 to 2019 that were identified using publicly available platforms and manual search/personal communications. Results: Twenty-seven CPGs were reviewed with content saturation achieved after reviewing eight. We found 16 key elements spanning from triage to postoperative care. Elements with high accord among CPGs included use of laparoscopy and delay of postoperative imaging for abscess screening until postoperative day seven. For simple appendicitis, all CPGs endorsed antibiotic cessation, diet advancement, and early activity, and 11 CPGs included same-day discharge. Elements with heterogeneity in decision-making included antibiotic selection/duration for perforated appendicitis, criteria defining perforation, and utility of postoperative laboratory evaluations. Conclusions: Development of an evidence-based CPGs for pediatric appendicitis requires attention to a finite number of key decision points and content areas. Existing literature demonstrates improved patient outcomes with CPG implementation.
AB - Background: Use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been shown to reduce care delays, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient outcomes. We conducted a systematized review to identify key elements that should be included in an evidence-based CPG for pediatric appendicitis. Methods: We characterized key decision points and content areas from CPGs developed from 2000 to 2019 that were identified using publicly available platforms and manual search/personal communications. Results: Twenty-seven CPGs were reviewed with content saturation achieved after reviewing eight. We found 16 key elements spanning from triage to postoperative care. Elements with high accord among CPGs included use of laparoscopy and delay of postoperative imaging for abscess screening until postoperative day seven. For simple appendicitis, all CPGs endorsed antibiotic cessation, diet advancement, and early activity, and 11 CPGs included same-day discharge. Elements with heterogeneity in decision-making included antibiotic selection/duration for perforated appendicitis, criteria defining perforation, and utility of postoperative laboratory evaluations. Conclusions: Development of an evidence-based CPGs for pediatric appendicitis requires attention to a finite number of key decision points and content areas. Existing literature demonstrates improved patient outcomes with CPG implementation.
KW - Clinical practice guideline
KW - Pediatric appendicitis
KW - Perforated appendicitis
KW - Practice guideline
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Simple appendicitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091804741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091804741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.056
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.056
M3 - Article
C2 - 33010554
AN - SCOPUS:85091804741
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 258
SP - 105
EP - 112
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -