Distinct corticospinal and reticulospinal contributions to voluntary control of elbow flexor and extensor muscles in humans with tetraplegia

Sina Sangari, Monica A. Perez*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Humans with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) often recover voluntary control of elbow flexors and, to a much lesser extent, elbow extensor muscles. The neural mechanisms underlying this asymmetrical recovery remain unknown. Anatomical and physiological evidence in animals and humans indicates that corticospinal and reticulospinal pathways differentially control elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons; therefore, it is possible that reorganization in these pathways contributes to the asymmetrical recovery of elbow muscles after SCI. To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex, maximal voluntary contractions, the StartReact response (a shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic startle cue on MEPs elicited by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMEPs) on biceps and triceps brachii in males and females with and without chronic cervical incomplete SCI. We found that SCI participants showed similar MEPs and maximal voluntary contractions in biceps but smaller responses in triceps compared with controls, suggesting reduced corticospinal inputs to elbow extensors. The StartReact and CMEP facilitation was larger in biceps but similar to controls in triceps, suggesting enhanced reticulospinal inputs to elbow flexors. These findings support the hypothesis that the recovery of biceps after cervical SCI results, at least in part, from increased reticulospinal inputs and that the lack of these extra inputs combined with the loss of corticospinal drive contribute to the pronounced weakness found in triceps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8831-8841
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume40
Issue number46
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 11 2020

Funding

Received May 8, 2020; revised Aug. 20, 2020; accepted Aug. 27, 2020. Author contributions: S.S. and M.A.P. designed research; S.S. and M.A.P. performed research; S.S. and M.A.P. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; S.S. and M.A.P. analyzed data; S.S. and M.A.P. wrote the first draft of the paper; S.S. and M.A.P. edited the paper; S.S. and M.A.P. wrote the paper. M.A.P. was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Department of Veterans Affairs. S.S. was supported by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence should be addressed to Monica A. Perez at [email protected]. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1107-20.2020 Copyright © 2020 the authors

Keywords

  • Biceps
  • Corticospinal
  • Humans
  • Reticulospinal
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Triceps

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinct corticospinal and reticulospinal contributions to voluntary control of elbow flexor and extensor muscles in humans with tetraplegia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this