TY - JOUR
T1 - Distribution of coronary artery calcium scores by framingham 10-year risk strata in the MESA (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis)
T2 - Potential implications for coronary risk assessment
AU - Okwuosa, Tochi M.
AU - Greenland, Philip
AU - Ning, Hongyan
AU - Liu, Kiang
AU - Bild, Diane E.
AU - Burke, Gregory L.
AU - Eng, John
AU - Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 through N01-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute , Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Greenland received an honorarium from GE/Toshiba in 2008. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships to disclose.
PY - 2011/5/3
Y1 - 2011/5/3
N2 - Objectives: By examining the distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) levels across Framingham risk score (FRS) strata in a large, multiethnic, community-based sample of men and women, we sought to determine if lower-risk persons could benefit from CAC screening. Background: The 10-year FRS and CAC levels are predictors of coronary heart disease. A CAC level of 300 or more is associated with the highest risk for coronary heart disease even in low-risk persons (FRS, <10%); however, expert groups have suggested CAC screening only in intermediate-risk groups (FRS, 10% to 20%). Methods: We included 5,660 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants. The number needed to screen (number of people that need to be screened to detect 1 person with CAC level above the specified cutoff point) was used to assess the yield of screening for CAC. CAC prevalence was compared across FRS strata using chi-square tests. Results: CAC levels of more than 0, of 100 or more, and of 300 or more were present in 46.4%, 20.6%, and 10.1% of participants, respectively. The prevalence and amount of CAC increased with higher FRS. A CAC level of 300 or more was observed in 1.7% and 4.4% of those with FRS of 0% to 2.5% and of 2.6% to 5%, respectively (number needed to screen, 59.7 and 22.7, respectively). Likewise, a CAC level of 300 or more was observed in 24% and 30% of those with FRS of 15.1% to 20% and more than 20%, respectively (number needed to screen, 4.2 and 3.3, respectively). Trends were similar when stratified by age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that in very low-risk individuals (FRS ≤5%), the yield of screening and probability of identifying persons with clinically significant levels of CAC is low, but becomes greater in low- and intermediate-risk persons (FRS 5.1% to 20%).
AB - Objectives: By examining the distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) levels across Framingham risk score (FRS) strata in a large, multiethnic, community-based sample of men and women, we sought to determine if lower-risk persons could benefit from CAC screening. Background: The 10-year FRS and CAC levels are predictors of coronary heart disease. A CAC level of 300 or more is associated with the highest risk for coronary heart disease even in low-risk persons (FRS, <10%); however, expert groups have suggested CAC screening only in intermediate-risk groups (FRS, 10% to 20%). Methods: We included 5,660 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants. The number needed to screen (number of people that need to be screened to detect 1 person with CAC level above the specified cutoff point) was used to assess the yield of screening for CAC. CAC prevalence was compared across FRS strata using chi-square tests. Results: CAC levels of more than 0, of 100 or more, and of 300 or more were present in 46.4%, 20.6%, and 10.1% of participants, respectively. The prevalence and amount of CAC increased with higher FRS. A CAC level of 300 or more was observed in 1.7% and 4.4% of those with FRS of 0% to 2.5% and of 2.6% to 5%, respectively (number needed to screen, 59.7 and 22.7, respectively). Likewise, a CAC level of 300 or more was observed in 24% and 30% of those with FRS of 15.1% to 20% and more than 20%, respectively (number needed to screen, 4.2 and 3.3, respectively). Trends were similar when stratified by age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that in very low-risk individuals (FRS ≤5%), the yield of screening and probability of identifying persons with clinically significant levels of CAC is low, but becomes greater in low- and intermediate-risk persons (FRS 5.1% to 20%).
KW - Framingham risk score
KW - atherosclerosis
KW - coronary calcium
KW - coronary heart disease
KW - low risk
KW - number needed to screen
KW - population
KW - risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955376265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955376265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.053
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.053
M3 - Article
C2 - 21527159
AN - SCOPUS:79955376265
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 57
SP - 1838
EP - 1845
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 18
ER -