Distributivity and modality: where 'each' may go, 'every' can't follow

Michaël Gagnon, Alexis Cornelia Wellwood

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Von Fintel and Iatridou (2003) observed a striking pattern of scopal noninteraction between phrases headed by strong quantifiers like 'every' and epistemically interpreted modal auxiliaries. Tancredi (2007) and Huitink (2008) observed that von Fintel and Iatridou’s proposed constraint, the Epistemic Containment Principle (ECP), does not apply uniformly: it does not apply to strong quantifiers headed by 'each'. We consider the ECP effect in light of the differential behavior of 'each' and 'every' in the environment of 'wh-', negative, and generic operators as described by Beghelli and Stowell (1997). Assuming that epistemic and root modals merge at two different syntactic heights (e.g. Cinque 1999) and that modals may act as unselective binders (Heim 1982), we extend Beghelli and Stowell’s topological approach to quantifier scope interactions in order to formulate a novel syntactic account of the ECP.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (SALT 21)
EditorsN Ashton, A Chereches, D Lutz
Place of PublicationIthaca, NY
PublisherCLC Publications
Pages39-55
Number of pages17
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Distributivity and modality: where 'each' may go, 'every' can't follow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this