Divided we stay home: Social distancing and ethnic diversity

Georgy Egorov, Ruben Enikolopov*, Alexey Makarin, Maria Petrova

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Homogeneous societies usually provide more public goods. Voluntary social distancing in a pandemic is also a public good, but it has private benefits, too. Theoretically, we show that presence of population groups with different rationales for social distancing can lead to stricter observance of social distancing in more diverse societies. Empirically, we find that mobility reduction following the first local COVID-19 case was stronger in Russian cities with higher ethnic fractionalization and xenophobia. For identification, we predict the timing of the first case using historical patterns of internal migration. Using the United States data on mobility produces similar results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104328
JournalJournal of Public Economics
Volume194
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Fractionalization
  • Pandemic
  • Quarantine
  • Russia
  • Self-isolation
  • Social distancing
  • Xenophobia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Divided we stay home: Social distancing and ethnic diversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this