Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?

David N. Figlio, Cecilia Elena Rouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study the effects of the threat of vouchers and stigma in Florida on the performance of "low-performing" schools. Estimates of the change in raw test scores from the first year of the reform are consistent with the early results which claimed large improvements associated with the threat of vouchers. However, we also find that much of this estimated effect may be due to other factors. The relative gains in reading are largely explained by changing student characteristics and the gains in math - though larger - appear limited to the high-stakes grade. We also find some evidence that these improvements were due more to the stigma of receiving the low grade rather than the threat of vouchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-255
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Public Economics
Volume90
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Vouchers
Accountability
Threat
Stigma
Factors
Test scores

Keywords

  • Florida A+ Plan
  • No Child Left Behind
  • School accountability
  • School voucher threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{e14769a83ca0402e94d2a61dfb228760,
title = "Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?",
abstract = "We study the effects of the threat of vouchers and stigma in Florida on the performance of {"}low-performing{"} schools. Estimates of the change in raw test scores from the first year of the reform are consistent with the early results which claimed large improvements associated with the threat of vouchers. However, we also find that much of this estimated effect may be due to other factors. The relative gains in reading are largely explained by changing student characteristics and the gains in math - though larger - appear limited to the high-stakes grade. We also find some evidence that these improvements were due more to the stigma of receiving the low grade rather than the threat of vouchers.",
keywords = "Florida A+ Plan, No Child Left Behind, School accountability, School voucher threat",
author = "Figlio, {David N.} and Rouse, {Cecilia Elena}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "239--255",
journal = "Journal of Public Economics",
issn = "0047-2727",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools? / Figlio, David N.; Rouse, Cecilia Elena.

In: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 90, No. 1-2, 01.01.2006, p. 239-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?

AU - Figlio, David N.

AU - Rouse, Cecilia Elena

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - We study the effects of the threat of vouchers and stigma in Florida on the performance of "low-performing" schools. Estimates of the change in raw test scores from the first year of the reform are consistent with the early results which claimed large improvements associated with the threat of vouchers. However, we also find that much of this estimated effect may be due to other factors. The relative gains in reading are largely explained by changing student characteristics and the gains in math - though larger - appear limited to the high-stakes grade. We also find some evidence that these improvements were due more to the stigma of receiving the low grade rather than the threat of vouchers.

AB - We study the effects of the threat of vouchers and stigma in Florida on the performance of "low-performing" schools. Estimates of the change in raw test scores from the first year of the reform are consistent with the early results which claimed large improvements associated with the threat of vouchers. However, we also find that much of this estimated effect may be due to other factors. The relative gains in reading are largely explained by changing student characteristics and the gains in math - though larger - appear limited to the high-stakes grade. We also find some evidence that these improvements were due more to the stigma of receiving the low grade rather than the threat of vouchers.

KW - Florida A+ Plan

KW - No Child Left Behind

KW - School accountability

KW - School voucher threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30544447435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30544447435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.005

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 239

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Public Economics

JF - Journal of Public Economics

SN - 0047-2727

IS - 1-2

ER -