Abstract
The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were 'good timers' with one effector tended to be 'good timers' with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.
| Language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages | 173-191 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Acta psychologica |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1985 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Cite this
}
Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms : A correlational analysis. / Keele, Steven W.; Pokorny, Robert A.; Corcos, Daniel M.; Ivry, Richard.
In: Acta psychologica, Vol. 60, No. 2-3, 01.01.1985, p. 173-191.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms
T2 - Acta Psychologica
AU - Keele, Steven W.
AU - Pokorny, Robert A.
AU - Corcos, Daniel M.
AU - Ivry, Richard
PY - 1985/1/1
Y1 - 1985/1/1
N2 - The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were 'good timers' with one effector tended to be 'good timers' with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.
AB - The two experiments of this study exploited individual variation in timing ability to ask whether the production of time intervals by different motor effectors and the judgement of perceptually based time intervals all share common timing mechanisms. In one task subjects produced a series of taps, attempting to maintain constant intervals between them. Individual differences in variability of the produced intervals correlated across the effectors of finger and foot. That is, people that were 'good timers' with one effector tended to be 'good timers' with another. Besides timing motor production, the subjects also judged durations of brief perceptual events. The acuity of perceptual judgements correlate substantially with regularity of motor production. Further results involving maximum speed of motor production suggested that variability of motor timing comes from two sources, one source in common with perception, and hence called clock variability, and the other source in common with motor speed, and hence called motor implementation variability. The second experiment showed that people high in skill on the piano were better at both types of timing on the average than control subjects with no expertise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022329396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022329396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X
DO - 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-X
M3 - Article
VL - 60
SP - 173
EP - 191
JO - Acta Psychologica
JF - Acta Psychologica
SN - 0001-6918
IS - 2-3
ER -