Does Gender Raise The Ethical Bar? Exploring The Punishment Of Ethical Violations at Work

J. Kennedy, Mary Hunter McDonnell, Nicole M Stephens

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

We investigate whether women are targets of more severe punishment than men following ethical violations at work. Using an experimental design, Study 1 finds evidence that ethical behavior is more strongly prescribed for women than for men, even when they occupy an identical professional role. Study 2 manipulates the gender of a manager in a hypothetical scenario and finds that women are punished more severely than men for ethical violations at work. It also tests the scope of our theory by asking whether women are punished more for errors in general, or only for intentional ethical violations. Using field data, Study 3 examines how severely attorneys are punished for violating the American Bar Association’s ethical rules. Female attorneys are punished more severely than male attorneys, after accounting for a variety of factors. Greater representation of women among decision-makers diminishes the gender disparity in punishment. Our research documents a new prescriptive stereotype faced by women and helps to explain the persistence of gender disparities in organizations. It highlights punishment severity as a novel mechanism by which institutions may derail women’s careers more than men’s.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages36
StatePublished - Mar 23 2016

Fingerprint

Punishment
Violations
Gender disparity
Severity
Decision maker
Stereotypes
Experimental design
Managers
Ethical behavior
Scenarios
Factors
Persistence

Cite this

@techreport{97c891fcf07b4910a6c948faf0705434,
title = "Does Gender Raise The Ethical Bar? Exploring The Punishment Of Ethical Violations at Work",
abstract = "We investigate whether women are targets of more severe punishment than men following ethical violations at work. Using an experimental design, Study 1 finds evidence that ethical behavior is more strongly prescribed for women than for men, even when they occupy an identical professional role. Study 2 manipulates the gender of a manager in a hypothetical scenario and finds that women are punished more severely than men for ethical violations at work. It also tests the scope of our theory by asking whether women are punished more for errors in general, or only for intentional ethical violations. Using field data, Study 3 examines how severely attorneys are punished for violating the American Bar Association’s ethical rules. Female attorneys are punished more severely than male attorneys, after accounting for a variety of factors. Greater representation of women among decision-makers diminishes the gender disparity in punishment. Our research documents a new prescriptive stereotype faced by women and helps to explain the persistence of gender disparities in organizations. It highlights punishment severity as a novel mechanism by which institutions may derail women’s careers more than men’s.",
author = "J. Kennedy and McDonnell, {Mary Hunter} and Stephens, {Nicole M}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "23",
language = "English (US)",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Does Gender Raise The Ethical Bar? Exploring The Punishment Of Ethical Violations at Work. / Kennedy, J.; McDonnell, Mary Hunter; Stephens, Nicole M.

2016.

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Does Gender Raise The Ethical Bar? Exploring The Punishment Of Ethical Violations at Work

AU - Kennedy, J.

AU - McDonnell, Mary Hunter

AU - Stephens, Nicole M

PY - 2016/3/23

Y1 - 2016/3/23

N2 - We investigate whether women are targets of more severe punishment than men following ethical violations at work. Using an experimental design, Study 1 finds evidence that ethical behavior is more strongly prescribed for women than for men, even when they occupy an identical professional role. Study 2 manipulates the gender of a manager in a hypothetical scenario and finds that women are punished more severely than men for ethical violations at work. It also tests the scope of our theory by asking whether women are punished more for errors in general, or only for intentional ethical violations. Using field data, Study 3 examines how severely attorneys are punished for violating the American Bar Association’s ethical rules. Female attorneys are punished more severely than male attorneys, after accounting for a variety of factors. Greater representation of women among decision-makers diminishes the gender disparity in punishment. Our research documents a new prescriptive stereotype faced by women and helps to explain the persistence of gender disparities in organizations. It highlights punishment severity as a novel mechanism by which institutions may derail women’s careers more than men’s.

AB - We investigate whether women are targets of more severe punishment than men following ethical violations at work. Using an experimental design, Study 1 finds evidence that ethical behavior is more strongly prescribed for women than for men, even when they occupy an identical professional role. Study 2 manipulates the gender of a manager in a hypothetical scenario and finds that women are punished more severely than men for ethical violations at work. It also tests the scope of our theory by asking whether women are punished more for errors in general, or only for intentional ethical violations. Using field data, Study 3 examines how severely attorneys are punished for violating the American Bar Association’s ethical rules. Female attorneys are punished more severely than male attorneys, after accounting for a variety of factors. Greater representation of women among decision-makers diminishes the gender disparity in punishment. Our research documents a new prescriptive stereotype faced by women and helps to explain the persistence of gender disparities in organizations. It highlights punishment severity as a novel mechanism by which institutions may derail women’s careers more than men’s.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Does Gender Raise The Ethical Bar? Exploring The Punishment Of Ethical Violations at Work

ER -