Does strength test satisfying code requirement for nominal strength justify ignoring size effect in shear?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

A recent University of Toronto test of a 925 mm (36.4 in.) deep beam without stirrups showed a shear strength vc that is only slightly below the value vc = 2√fc' required by ACI 318-08, and comfortably above the value Φ × 2√fc' (where ?= 0.75 is the strength reduction factor, and vc and fc' are in psi). On that basis, and in view of the safety provisions of the Code, it is often thought that the current shear strength provisions for beams up to 0.2 m (8 in.) deep, which neglects the size effect, are safe for beams up to 1 m (40 in.) deep. This is not true, however, for it must be expected that if numerous tests of 1 m (40 in.) deep beams with different shear spans and steel ratios, made of different concretes and under different hygro-thermal conditions, could be carried out, the beam strength would exhibit a similar statistical scatter, with approximately the same coefficient of variation (CoV), as the strength of beams up to 0.2 m (8 in.) deep, for which there are numerous test results in the database. Based on this expected scatter, it is shown that neglecting the size effect for beams up to 1 m (40 in.) deep is likely to increase the expected frequency of failures from approximately 1 in a million to approximately 1 in a thousand when the beam depth increases from 0.2 to 1 m (8 to 40 in.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-19
Number of pages6
JournalACI Structural Journal
Volume106
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Keywords

  • Deep beams
  • Shear strength
  • Size effect
  • Stirrups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does strength test satisfying code requirement for nominal strength justify ignoring size effect in shear?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this