Dominant effects of CCR2-CCR5 haplotypes in HIV-1 disease progression

Cheryl A. Winkler, Houria Hendel, Mary Carrington, Michael W. Smith, George W. Nelson, Stephen J. O'Brien, John Phair, David Vlahov, Lisa P. Jacobson, Jay Rappaport, Alexandre Vasilescu, Sebastien Bertin-Maghit, Ping An, Wei Lu, Jean Marie Andrieu, François Schächter, Amu Therwath, Jean François Zagury*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


Three haplotypes for the CCR2-CCR5 region previously have been shown to affect AIDS progression; however, it is not known if the protective and accelerating effects of the haplotypes are relatively constant throughout infection or exert their effects early or late in HIV type 1 infection. The authors report the relative contributions to AIDS progression of CCR2 641, CCR5 Δ32, and the CCR5 promoter haplotype +.P1.+ in the GRIV cohort, which included patients representing the extremes of the distribution for AIDS progression: rapid progressors (RP) who developed CD4+ T-cell counts of <300/ mm3 within 3 years after the last HIV-1-seronegative test and slow progressors (SP) who were HIV-1 infected for ≥8 years with CD4 + T-cell counts of >500/mm3. Comparing the RP with a seroconverter control group including intermediate progressors to AIDS, we observed the early protective effect of CCR5 Δ32 (odds ratio = 0.25; P = 0.007) was similar in strength to the early susceptible effect of CCR5 +.P1.+ (odds ratio = 2.1, P = 0.01). Comparison of the intermediate control group to the SP showed weaker and less significant odd ratios, suggesting that the effect of these factors tended to be stronger on early progession; the tendency towards a disproportionately early effect was significant for CCR5 Δ32 (P = 0.04) but not for CCR5 +.P1.+ (P = 0.12). Follow-up of SP demonstrated that these polymorphisms have little effect after 8 years, because the subset of SP who had progression after study entry had the same genotype distribution as the global population of SP, suggesting that factors other than CCR5 or CCR2 genetic variants must be responsible for the long- term maintenance of nonprogression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1534-1538
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004


  • AIDS
  • CCR2
  • CCR5
  • Disease progression
  • HIV
  • Haplotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology (medical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Dominant effects of CCR2-CCR5 haplotypes in HIV-1 disease progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this