Drawing on Experience: How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes

Benjamin D. Jee, Dedre Gentner, David H Uttal, Bradley B Sageman, Kenneth D Forbus, Cathryn A. Manduca, Carol J. Ormand, Thomas F. Shipley, Basil Tikoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Capturing the nature of students’ mental representations and how they change with learning is a primary goal in science education research. This can be challenging in spatially intense domains, such as geoscience, architecture, and engineering. In this research, we test whether sketching can be used to gauge level of expertise in geoscience, using new technology designed to facilitate this process. We asked participants with differing levels of geoscience experience to copy two kinds of geoscience images—photographs of rock formations and causal diagrams. To permit studying the process of sketching as well as the structure and content of the sketches, we used the CogSketch system (Forbus et al. 2011, Topics in Cognitive Science 3:648–666) to record the time course of sketching and analyze the sketches themselves. Relative to novices, geoscience students included more geological structures and relational symbols in their sketches of geoscience materials and were more likely to construct their sketches in a sequence consistent with the order of causal events. These differences appear to stem from differences in domain knowledge, because they did not show up in participants’ sketches of materials from other fields. The findings and methods of this research suggest new ways to promote and assess science learning, which are well suited to the visual–spatial demands of many domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)859-883
Number of pages25
JournalResearch in Science Education
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 14 2014

Fingerprint

knowledge
experience
science
learning
new technology
symbol
expertise
student
engineering
event
education
time

Keywords

  • Causal knowledge
  • STEM
  • Science education
  • Sketching
  • Sketching software
  • Spatial knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{5c80ca44aa244a378700141b4d51d294,
title = "Drawing on Experience: How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes",
abstract = "Capturing the nature of students’ mental representations and how they change with learning is a primary goal in science education research. This can be challenging in spatially intense domains, such as geoscience, architecture, and engineering. In this research, we test whether sketching can be used to gauge level of expertise in geoscience, using new technology designed to facilitate this process. We asked participants with differing levels of geoscience experience to copy two kinds of geoscience images—photographs of rock formations and causal diagrams. To permit studying the process of sketching as well as the structure and content of the sketches, we used the CogSketch system (Forbus et al. 2011, Topics in Cognitive Science 3:648–666) to record the time course of sketching and analyze the sketches themselves. Relative to novices, geoscience students included more geological structures and relational symbols in their sketches of geoscience materials and were more likely to construct their sketches in a sequence consistent with the order of causal events. These differences appear to stem from differences in domain knowledge, because they did not show up in participants’ sketches of materials from other fields. The findings and methods of this research suggest new ways to promote and assess science learning, which are well suited to the visual–spatial demands of many domains.",
keywords = "Causal knowledge, STEM, Science education, Sketching, Sketching software, Spatial knowledge",
author = "Jee, {Benjamin D.} and Dedre Gentner and Uttal, {David H} and Sageman, {Bradley B} and Forbus, {Kenneth D} and Manduca, {Cathryn A.} and Ormand, {Carol J.} and Shipley, {Thomas F.} and Basil Tikoff",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s11165-014-9405-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "859--883",
journal = "Research in Science Education",
issn = "0157-244X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Drawing on Experience : How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes. / Jee, Benjamin D.; Gentner, Dedre; Uttal, David H; Sageman, Bradley B; Forbus, Kenneth D; Manduca, Cathryn A.; Ormand, Carol J.; Shipley, Thomas F.; Tikoff, Basil.

In: Research in Science Education, Vol. 44, No. 6, 14.12.2014, p. 859-883.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drawing on Experience

T2 - How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes

AU - Jee, Benjamin D.

AU - Gentner, Dedre

AU - Uttal, David H

AU - Sageman, Bradley B

AU - Forbus, Kenneth D

AU - Manduca, Cathryn A.

AU - Ormand, Carol J.

AU - Shipley, Thomas F.

AU - Tikoff, Basil

PY - 2014/12/14

Y1 - 2014/12/14

N2 - Capturing the nature of students’ mental representations and how they change with learning is a primary goal in science education research. This can be challenging in spatially intense domains, such as geoscience, architecture, and engineering. In this research, we test whether sketching can be used to gauge level of expertise in geoscience, using new technology designed to facilitate this process. We asked participants with differing levels of geoscience experience to copy two kinds of geoscience images—photographs of rock formations and causal diagrams. To permit studying the process of sketching as well as the structure and content of the sketches, we used the CogSketch system (Forbus et al. 2011, Topics in Cognitive Science 3:648–666) to record the time course of sketching and analyze the sketches themselves. Relative to novices, geoscience students included more geological structures and relational symbols in their sketches of geoscience materials and were more likely to construct their sketches in a sequence consistent with the order of causal events. These differences appear to stem from differences in domain knowledge, because they did not show up in participants’ sketches of materials from other fields. The findings and methods of this research suggest new ways to promote and assess science learning, which are well suited to the visual–spatial demands of many domains.

AB - Capturing the nature of students’ mental representations and how they change with learning is a primary goal in science education research. This can be challenging in spatially intense domains, such as geoscience, architecture, and engineering. In this research, we test whether sketching can be used to gauge level of expertise in geoscience, using new technology designed to facilitate this process. We asked participants with differing levels of geoscience experience to copy two kinds of geoscience images—photographs of rock formations and causal diagrams. To permit studying the process of sketching as well as the structure and content of the sketches, we used the CogSketch system (Forbus et al. 2011, Topics in Cognitive Science 3:648–666) to record the time course of sketching and analyze the sketches themselves. Relative to novices, geoscience students included more geological structures and relational symbols in their sketches of geoscience materials and were more likely to construct their sketches in a sequence consistent with the order of causal events. These differences appear to stem from differences in domain knowledge, because they did not show up in participants’ sketches of materials from other fields. The findings and methods of this research suggest new ways to promote and assess science learning, which are well suited to the visual–spatial demands of many domains.

KW - Causal knowledge

KW - STEM

KW - Science education

KW - Sketching

KW - Sketching software

KW - Spatial knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919471917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919471917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11165-014-9405-2

DO - 10.1007/s11165-014-9405-2

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 859

EP - 883

JO - Research in Science Education

JF - Research in Science Education

SN - 0157-244X

IS - 6

ER -