Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support

Ahmad Zeeshan, Jay J. Idrees, Douglas R. Johnston, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, Eric E. Roselli, Edward G. Soltesz, A. Marc Gillinov, Brian Griffin, Richard Grimm, Donald F. Hammer, Gösta B. Pettersson, Eugene H. Blackstone, Joseph F. Sabik, Lars G. Svensson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: To determine the value of aortic valve repair rather than replacement for valve dysfunction, we assessed late outcomes of various repair techniques in the contemporary era. Methods: From January 2001 to January 2011, aortic valve repair was planned in 1,124 patients. Techniques involved commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures (n = 63 [6.2%]), cusp repair with commissuroplasty (n = 481 [48%]), debridement (n = 174 [17%]), free-margin plication (n = 271 [27%]) or resection (n = 75) or both, or annulus repair with resuspension (n = 230 [23%]), root reimplantation (n = 252 [25%]), or remodeling (n = 35 [3.5%]). Results: Planned repair was aborted for replacement in 115 patients (10%); risk factors included greater severity of aortic regurgitation (AR; p = 0.0002) and valve calcification (p < 0.0001). In-hospital outcomes for the remaining 1,009 patients included death (12 [1.2%]), stroke (13 [1.3%]), and reoperation for valve dysfunction (14 [1.4%]). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97%, 93%, and 90%, respectively. Figure-of-8 suspension sutures, valve resuspension, and root repair and replacement were least likely to require reoperation; cusp repair with commissural sutures, plication, and commissuroplasty was most likely (p < 0.05). Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96%, 92%, and 83%. Immediate postoperative AR grade was none-mild (94%), moderate (5%), and severe (1%). At 10 years after repair, AR grade was none (20%), mild (33%), moderate (26%), and severe (21%). Patients undergoing root procedures were less likely to have higher-grade postoperative AR (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Valve repair is effective and durable for treating aortic valve dysfunction. Greater severity of AR preoperatively is associated with higher likelihood of repair failure. Commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures and repair with annular support have the best long-term durability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)739-748
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Funding

This study was partly funded by the Gus P. Karos Registry Fund, the Reiman Foundation, the David Whitmire Hearst, Jr. Foundation, the Anderson Family Foundation, the Judith Dion Pyle Endowed Chair in Heart Valve Research, the John and Rosemary Brown Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine, the Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower and Family Endowed Chair in Cardiothoracic Research, and the Drs Sidney and Becca Fleischer Heart and Vascular Education Chair. Dr Svensson is an unpaid member of the executive committee for PARTNER trials I and II, chairman of the PARTNER Publication Committee, and an unpaid member of the executive committee of the COMMENCE (ProspeCtive, nOn-randoMized, MulticENter Clinical Evaluation of Edwards Pericardial Bioprostheses With a New Tissue Treatment Platform) trial, sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this