Dynamic risk, accounting-based valuation and firm fundamentals

Matthew R. Lyle, Jeffrey L. Callen, Robert J. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study extends the accounting-based valuation framework of Ohlson (Contemp Acc Res 11(2):661-687, 1995) and Feltham and Ohlson (Acc Rev 74(2):165-183, 1999) to incorporate dynamic expectations about the level of systematic risk in the economy. Our model explains recent empirical findings documenting a strong negative association between changes in economy-wide risk and future stock returns. Importantly, the model also generates costs of capital that are solely a linear function of accounting variables and other firm fundamentals, including the book-to-market ratio, the earnings-to-price ratio, the forward earnings-to-price ratio, size and the dividend yield. This result provides a theoretical rationale for the inclusion of these popular variables in cost of capital (expected return) computations by the accounting and finance literatures and obviates the need to estimate costs of capital from unobservable (future) covariances. The model also generates an accounting return decomposition in the spirit of Vuolteenaho (J Finance 57(1):233-264, 2002). Empirically, we find that costs of capital generated by our model are significantly associated with future returns both in and out of sample in contrast to standard benchmark models. We further obtain significantly lower valuation errors in out-of-sample tests than traditional models that ignore dynamic risk expectations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)899-929
Number of pages31
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Accounting valuation
  • Cost of capital
  • Dynamic risk
  • Firm fundamentals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic risk, accounting-based valuation and firm fundamentals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this