Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers

Hao Peng, Daniel M. Romero*, Emoke Ágnes Horvát*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Retracted papers often circulate widely on social media, digital news, and other websites before their official retraction.The spread of potentially inaccurate or misleading results from retracted papers can harm the scientific community and the public. Here, we quantify the amount and type of attention 3,851 retracted papers received over time in different online platforms. Comparingwith a set of nonretracted control papers fromthe same journals with similar publication year, number of coauthors, and author impact, we show that retracted papers receive more attention after publication not only on social media but also, on heavily curated platforms, such as news outlets and knowledge repositories, amplifying the negative impact on the public. At the same time, we find that posts on Twitter tend to express more criticism about retracted than about control papers, suggesting that criticism-expressing tweets could contain factual information about problematic papers.Most importantly, around the time they are retracted, papers generate discussions that are primarily about the retraction incident rather than about research findings, showing that by this point, papers have exhausted attention to their results and highlighting the limited effect of retractions. Our findings reveal the extent to which retracted papers are discussed on different online platforms and identify at scale audience criticism toward them. In this context, we show that retraction is not an effective tool to reduce online attention to problematic papers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2119086119
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume119
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 21 2022

Keywords

  • collective attention
  • retraction
  • science of science
  • scientific misinformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this