Dysphagia Days as an Assessment of Clinical Treatment Outcome in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Ikuo Hirano*, Marc E. Rothenberg, Sandra Zhang, Claudia De Oliveira, Christina M. Charriez, Karin S. Coyne, Elizabeth Dansie Bacci, Evan S. Dellon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:The aim of this study was to evaluate Dysphagia Days as a measure of symptom improvement in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis from the HEROES study.METHODS:Dysphagia Days, defined as a yes answer to the following question: During any meal today, did food go down slowly or get stuck in your throat or chest? was assessed for cendakimab vs placebo.RESULTS:A statistically significant reduction in the mean number of Dysphagia Days experienced was observed with cendakimab 360 mg vs placebo at week 16 (-4.67 vs -1.83; P = 0.0115); an even greater improvement was observed in steroid-refractory patients vs placebo (-4.48 vs -0.04; P = 0.0079).DISCUSSION:Dysphagia Days represents a relevant clinical end point to capture dysphagia-related symptoms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)744-747
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2023

Funding

Financial support: This study was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. Writing and editorial assistance were provided by Claire Jarvis, PhD, and John Simmons, MD, of Peloton Advantage, an OPEN Health company, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dysphagia Days as an Assessment of Clinical Treatment Outcome in Eosinophilic Esophagitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this