TY - JOUR
T1 - Early microbiological response to linezolid vs vancomycin in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
AU - Wunderink, Richard G.
AU - Mendelson, Meryl H.
AU - Somero, Michael S.
AU - Fabian, Timothy C.
AU - May, Addison K.
AU - Bhattacharyya, Helen
AU - Leeper, Kenneth V.
AU - Solomkin, Joseph S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Pfizer Inc. Editorial support was provided by Phil Matthews and Elizabeth Melby Wells at PAREXEL and was funded by Pfizer Inc.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial compared the early microbiological efficacy of linezolid (LZD) therapy with that of vancomycin (VAN) therapy in patients with MRSA VAP. Methods: A total of 149 patients with suspected MRSA VAP were randomized to receive either LZD, 600 mg, or VAN, 1 g every 12 h. Patients with baseline bronchoscopic BAL (BBAL) fluid quantitative culture findings that were positive for MRSA (≥ 104 cfu/mL) comprised the study population. The primary outcome was microbiological response (≤ 102 cfu/mL) in a second BBAL performed 72 to 96 h following the start of treatment. Results: Thirty LZD-treated patients and 20 VAN-treated patients had microbiologically confirmed MRSA at baseline; 23 and 19 patients, respectively, underwent repeat BBAL. While a greater number of LZD-treated patients than VAN-treated patients achieved a microbiological cure (56.5% vs 47.4%, respectively; p = 0.757; 95% confidence interval, -21.1 to 39.4), this difference was not statistically significant. Nonstatistically significant differences were also seen for LZD-treated patients vs VAN-treated patients in terms of clinical cure (66.7% vs 52.9%, respectively), survival rate (86.7% vs 70.0%, respectively), and the mean duration of ventilation (10.4 vs 14.3 d, respectively), hospitalization (18.8 vs 20.1 d, respectively), ICU stay (12.2 vs 16.2 d, respectively), and time spent alive and not receiving mechanical ventilation (15.5 vs 11.1 d, respectively). Three patients who had been extubated prior to undergoing repeat BBAL had been randomized to receive LZD therapy. Conclusion: Early microbiological cure rates were not statistically significantly higher with LZD therapy than with VAN therapy despite trends in all secondary clinical outcomes favoring LZD therapy. These results suggest that any beneficial effect of LZD therapy may be due to factors other than increased bacterial clearance. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00572559.
AB - Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial compared the early microbiological efficacy of linezolid (LZD) therapy with that of vancomycin (VAN) therapy in patients with MRSA VAP. Methods: A total of 149 patients with suspected MRSA VAP were randomized to receive either LZD, 600 mg, or VAN, 1 g every 12 h. Patients with baseline bronchoscopic BAL (BBAL) fluid quantitative culture findings that were positive for MRSA (≥ 104 cfu/mL) comprised the study population. The primary outcome was microbiological response (≤ 102 cfu/mL) in a second BBAL performed 72 to 96 h following the start of treatment. Results: Thirty LZD-treated patients and 20 VAN-treated patients had microbiologically confirmed MRSA at baseline; 23 and 19 patients, respectively, underwent repeat BBAL. While a greater number of LZD-treated patients than VAN-treated patients achieved a microbiological cure (56.5% vs 47.4%, respectively; p = 0.757; 95% confidence interval, -21.1 to 39.4), this difference was not statistically significant. Nonstatistically significant differences were also seen for LZD-treated patients vs VAN-treated patients in terms of clinical cure (66.7% vs 52.9%, respectively), survival rate (86.7% vs 70.0%, respectively), and the mean duration of ventilation (10.4 vs 14.3 d, respectively), hospitalization (18.8 vs 20.1 d, respectively), ICU stay (12.2 vs 16.2 d, respectively), and time spent alive and not receiving mechanical ventilation (15.5 vs 11.1 d, respectively). Three patients who had been extubated prior to undergoing repeat BBAL had been randomized to receive LZD therapy. Conclusion: Early microbiological cure rates were not statistically significantly higher with LZD therapy than with VAN therapy despite trends in all secondary clinical outcomes favoring LZD therapy. These results suggest that any beneficial effect of LZD therapy may be due to factors other than increased bacterial clearance. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00572559.
KW - Bronchoscopy
KW - Linezolid
KW - Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
KW - Vancomycin
KW - Ventilator-associated pneumonia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349105662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349105662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1378/chest.08-0011
DO - 10.1378/chest.08-0011
M3 - Article
C2 - 18719064
AN - SCOPUS:57349105662
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 134
SP - 1200
EP - 1207
JO - Diseases of the chest
JF - Diseases of the chest
IS - 6
ER -