Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry: A Comparison With Other National Registries

Nathanael Heckmann, Hansel Ihn, Michael Stefl, Caryn Diane Etkin, Bryan D. Springer, Daniel J. Berry, Jay R. Lieberman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was created to capture knee and hip arthroplasty data in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare early reports from the AJRR to other national registries to identify topics for future analysis. Methods: Hip and knee arthroplasty data were extracted from the AJRR, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden from 2014 to 2016. Hip arthroplasty data including femoral and acetabular fixation, bearing surface, head size, dual-mobility bearings, resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Knee arthroplasty data including polyethylene type, unicondylar arthroplasty, mobile bearings, cruciate-retaining implants, patella resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Registry characteristics and patient demographics were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: In 2016, the AJRR captured 28% of arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States compared with 95%-98.3% among other registries. Cementless femoral fixation was 96.7% in the AJRR compared with 21.8%-63.4%. Ceramic and 36-mm heads were most common in AJRR; all other registries reported that metal and 32-mm heads were most popular. Dual-mobility articulations were used in 8% of primary and 28% of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures in the AJRR. The AJRR reported a unicondylar knee arthroplasty rate of 3.2% compared with 5.1%-13.3% in other registries, but the highest rates of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties (48.5% compared to 8.2%-28.7%) and patella resurfacing (93.9% compared to 2.4%-51.6%). Conclusion: Several differences in hip and knee arthroplasty practices exist between the United States and other countries. Future studies should focus on understanding why differences in practice trends exist and assess outcomes associated with these practices. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S125-S134.e1
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Replacement Arthroplasties
Registries
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Hip
Arthroplasty
Patella
Head
Thigh
Ceramics
Polyethylene
Norway

Keywords

  • AJRR
  • American Joint Replacement Registry
  • database
  • practice trends
  • registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Heckmann, Nathanael ; Ihn, Hansel ; Stefl, Michael ; Etkin, Caryn Diane ; Springer, Bryan D. ; Berry, Daniel J. ; Lieberman, Jay R. / Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry : A Comparison With Other National Registries. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. S125-S134.e1.
@article{27ad37845059409191472e048f1fced9,
title = "Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry: A Comparison With Other National Registries",
abstract = "Background: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was created to capture knee and hip arthroplasty data in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare early reports from the AJRR to other national registries to identify topics for future analysis. Methods: Hip and knee arthroplasty data were extracted from the AJRR, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden from 2014 to 2016. Hip arthroplasty data including femoral and acetabular fixation, bearing surface, head size, dual-mobility bearings, resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Knee arthroplasty data including polyethylene type, unicondylar arthroplasty, mobile bearings, cruciate-retaining implants, patella resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Registry characteristics and patient demographics were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: In 2016, the AJRR captured 28{\%} of arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States compared with 95{\%}-98.3{\%} among other registries. Cementless femoral fixation was 96.7{\%} in the AJRR compared with 21.8{\%}-63.4{\%}. Ceramic and 36-mm heads were most common in AJRR; all other registries reported that metal and 32-mm heads were most popular. Dual-mobility articulations were used in 8{\%} of primary and 28{\%} of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures in the AJRR. The AJRR reported a unicondylar knee arthroplasty rate of 3.2{\%} compared with 5.1{\%}-13.3{\%} in other registries, but the highest rates of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties (48.5{\%} compared to 8.2{\%}-28.7{\%}) and patella resurfacing (93.9{\%} compared to 2.4{\%}-51.6{\%}). Conclusion: Several differences in hip and knee arthroplasty practices exist between the United States and other countries. Future studies should focus on understanding why differences in practice trends exist and assess outcomes associated with these practices. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective.",
keywords = "AJRR, American Joint Replacement Registry, database, practice trends, registry",
author = "Nathanael Heckmann and Hansel Ihn and Michael Stefl and Etkin, {Caryn Diane} and Springer, {Bryan D.} and Berry, {Daniel J.} and Lieberman, {Jay R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "S125--S134.e1",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "7",

}

Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry : A Comparison With Other National Registries. / Heckmann, Nathanael; Ihn, Hansel; Stefl, Michael; Etkin, Caryn Diane; Springer, Bryan D.; Berry, Daniel J.; Lieberman, Jay R.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 34, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. S125-S134.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry

T2 - A Comparison With Other National Registries

AU - Heckmann, Nathanael

AU - Ihn, Hansel

AU - Stefl, Michael

AU - Etkin, Caryn Diane

AU - Springer, Bryan D.

AU - Berry, Daniel J.

AU - Lieberman, Jay R.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Background: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was created to capture knee and hip arthroplasty data in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare early reports from the AJRR to other national registries to identify topics for future analysis. Methods: Hip and knee arthroplasty data were extracted from the AJRR, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden from 2014 to 2016. Hip arthroplasty data including femoral and acetabular fixation, bearing surface, head size, dual-mobility bearings, resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Knee arthroplasty data including polyethylene type, unicondylar arthroplasty, mobile bearings, cruciate-retaining implants, patella resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Registry characteristics and patient demographics were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: In 2016, the AJRR captured 28% of arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States compared with 95%-98.3% among other registries. Cementless femoral fixation was 96.7% in the AJRR compared with 21.8%-63.4%. Ceramic and 36-mm heads were most common in AJRR; all other registries reported that metal and 32-mm heads were most popular. Dual-mobility articulations were used in 8% of primary and 28% of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures in the AJRR. The AJRR reported a unicondylar knee arthroplasty rate of 3.2% compared with 5.1%-13.3% in other registries, but the highest rates of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties (48.5% compared to 8.2%-28.7%) and patella resurfacing (93.9% compared to 2.4%-51.6%). Conclusion: Several differences in hip and knee arthroplasty practices exist between the United States and other countries. Future studies should focus on understanding why differences in practice trends exist and assess outcomes associated with these practices. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective.

AB - Background: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was created to capture knee and hip arthroplasty data in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare early reports from the AJRR to other national registries to identify topics for future analysis. Methods: Hip and knee arthroplasty data were extracted from the AJRR, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden from 2014 to 2016. Hip arthroplasty data including femoral and acetabular fixation, bearing surface, head size, dual-mobility bearings, resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Knee arthroplasty data including polyethylene type, unicondylar arthroplasty, mobile bearings, cruciate-retaining implants, patella resurfacing, and revision burden were compared. Registry characteristics and patient demographics were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: In 2016, the AJRR captured 28% of arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States compared with 95%-98.3% among other registries. Cementless femoral fixation was 96.7% in the AJRR compared with 21.8%-63.4%. Ceramic and 36-mm heads were most common in AJRR; all other registries reported that metal and 32-mm heads were most popular. Dual-mobility articulations were used in 8% of primary and 28% of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures in the AJRR. The AJRR reported a unicondylar knee arthroplasty rate of 3.2% compared with 5.1%-13.3% in other registries, but the highest rates of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties (48.5% compared to 8.2%-28.7%) and patella resurfacing (93.9% compared to 2.4%-51.6%). Conclusion: Several differences in hip and knee arthroplasty practices exist between the United States and other countries. Future studies should focus on understanding why differences in practice trends exist and assess outcomes associated with these practices. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective.

KW - AJRR

KW - American Joint Replacement Registry

KW - database

KW - practice trends

KW - registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060689344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060689344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.027

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 30711371

AN - SCOPUS:85060689344

VL - 34

SP - S125-S134.e1

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 7

ER -