'Easy to treat' genotypes were not created equal: Can rapid virological response (RVR) level the playing field?

Andres Duarte-Rojo, Elizabeth Jenny Heathcote, Jordan Jay Feld*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Genotypes 2 and 3 (G2/G3) of hepatitis C virus have been lumped together as 'easy to treat'. As a result, guidelines recommend 24 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin for both. However, a closer look at trials shows that these genotypes are not the same, with G2 infection proving more responsive to peginterferon. The data supporting this conclusion are presented along with possible explanations for the differences observed. Ultimately, decisions must be made about therapy. Rapid virological response (RVR) may be the best parameter predicting successful antiviral therapy. For patients with G2 infection who achieve an RVR, shortened courses of therapy are effective. In contrast, for G3 patients without an RVR, there may be benefit to extending therapy to 48 weeks; however, this requires confirmation in prospective studies. Using RVR to guide therapy may level the playing field between these 'easy to treat' genotypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)466-473
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Keywords

  • Genotypes
  • Hepatitis C virus
  • Insulin resistance
  • Peginterferon
  • Prognostic factors
  • Ribavirin
  • Viral kinetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Easy to treat' genotypes were not created equal: Can rapid virological response (RVR) level the playing field?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this