Echocardiographic assessment of patients with infectious endocarditis: Prediction of risk for complications

Anthony J. Sanfilippo*, Michael H. Picard, John B. Newell, Emma Rosas, Ravin Davidoff, James D. Thomas, Arthur E. Weyman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

280 Scopus citations


To enhance the echocardiographic identification of high risk lesions in patients with infectious endocarditis, the medical records and two-dimensional echocardiograms of 204 patients with this condition were analyzed. The occurrence of specific clinical complications was recorded and vegetations were assessed with respect to predetermined morphologic characteristics. The overall complication rates were roughly equivalent for patients with mitral (53%), aortic (62%), tricuspid (77%) and prosthetic valve (61%) vegetations, as well as for those with nonspecific valvular changes but no discrete vegetations (57%), although the distribution of specific complications varied considerably among these groups. There were significantly fewer complications in patients without discernible valvular abnormalities (27%). In native left-sided valve endocarditis, vegetation size, extent, mobility and consistency were all found to be significant univariate predictors of complications. In multivariate analysis, vegetation size, extent and mobility emerged as optimal predictors and an echocardiographic score based on these factors predicted the occurrence of complications with 70% sensitivity and 92% specificity in mitral valve endocarditis and with 76% sensitivity and 62% specificity in aortic valve endocarditis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1199
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 1 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Echocardiographic assessment of patients with infectious endocarditis: Prediction of risk for complications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this