Abstract
Arthroscopic irrigation and debridement has long been known to be an effective treatment for acute septic arthritis of native joints. Systematic review shows that when compared to open irrigation and debridement, arthroscopy yields comparable hospital length of stay complication, reoperation, and readmission rates, as well as better patient-reported outcomes compared to open arthrotomy. However, reoperation rates are heterogeneously defined in the literature, not to mention that unplanned return to surgery likely suggests inadequate prior irrigation and debridement of an infection, whereas a planned repeat washout may be a surgeon's intention and practice for septic arthritis. Most of all, this condition should be managed urgently.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 981-982 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2024 |
Funding
The author reports the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: V.K.T. is on the Editorial Board for Arthroscopy, the American Journal of Sports Medicine, and the Video Journal of Sports Medicine. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine