Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing

Gregory E. Kaebnick*, David Christopher Magnus, Audiey Kao, Mohammad Hosseini, David Resnik, Veljko Dubljević, Christy Rentmeester, Bert Gordijn, Mark J. Cherry

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also be valuable for achieving those goals. In the interests of fostering a wider conversation about how generative AI may be used, we have developed a preliminary set of recommendations for its use in scholarly publishing. We hope that the recommendations and rationales set out here will help the scholarly community navigate toward a deeper understanding of the strengths, limits, and challenges of AI for responsible scholarly work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy
StatePublished - Dec 2023


  • Bioethics
  • Chatbots
  • Generative AI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this