Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Jeffrey J. Goldberger*, Robert O. Bonow, Michael Cuffe, Lei Liu, Yves Rosenberg, Prediman K. Shah, Sidney C. Smith, Haris Subačius

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

113 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction (MI) improves survival. Beta-blocker doses used in clinical practice are often substantially lower than those used in the randomized trials establishing their efficacy. Objectives This study evaluated the association of beta-blocker dose with survival after acute MI, hypothesizing that higher dose beta-blocker therapy will be associated with increased survival. Methods A multicenter registry enrolled 7,057 consecutive patients with acute MI. Discharge beta-blocker dose was indexed to the target beta-blocker doses used in randomized clinical trials, grouped as >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, >25% to 50%, and >50% of target dose. Follow-up vital status was assessed, with the primary endpoint of time-to-death right-censored at 2 years. Multivariable and propensity score analyses were used to account for group differences. Results Of 6,682 patients with follow-up (median 2.1 years), 91.5% were discharged on a beta-blocker (mean dose 38.1% of the target dose). Lower mortality was observed with all beta-blocker doses (p < 0.0002) versus no beta-blocker therapy. After multivariable adjustment, hazard ratios for 2-year mortality compared with the >50% dose were 0.862 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677 to 1.098), 0.799 (95% CI: 0.635 to 1.005), and 0.963 (95% CI: 0.765 to 1.213) for the >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, and >25% to 50% of target dose groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis with an extended set of covariates and propensity score analysis also demonstrated that higher doses were not associated with better outcome. Conclusions These data do not demonstrate increased survival in patients treated with beta-blocker doses approximating those used in previous randomized clinical trials compared with lower doses. These findings provide the rationale to re-engage in research to establish appropriate beta-blocker dosing after MI to derive optimal benefit from this therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1431-1441
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume66
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 29 2015

Funding

The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and an observational study monitoring board, appointed by the institute, monitored study conduct. The study was approved by each site’s institutional review board with a waiver of consent for registry enrollment. Participating centers and study committees and personnel are listed in the Online Appendix . This research was supported by grant 5U01HL080416 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. The views expressed in this manuscript are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Liu is a consultant to Celladon, Outcome Research Solutions, and Zensun. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Keywords

  • adrenergic beta-antagonists
  • follow-up studies
  • registries
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this