TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of partner social support predicts enduring psychological distress after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
AU - Rini, Christine Marie
AU - Redd, William H.
AU - Austin, Jane
AU - Mosher, Catherine E.
AU - Meschian, Yeraz Markarian
AU - Isola, Luis
AU - Scigliano, Eileen
AU - Moskowitz, Craig H.
AU - Papadopoulos, Esperanza
AU - Labay, Larissa E.
AU - Rowley, Scott
AU - Burkhalter, Jack E.
AU - Schetter, Christine Dunkel
AU - Duhamel, Katherine N.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Objective: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) survivors who are 1 to 3 years posttransplant are challenged by the need to resume valued social roles and activities - a task that may be complicated by enduring transplant-related psychological distress common in this patient population. The present study investigated whether transplant survivors who receive adequate social support from their spouse or intimate partner experience lower distress. Method: Effects of receiving a greater quantity of partner support (a common approach to studying enacted support) were compared with effects of receiving more effective partner support (i.e., support that more closely matches their needs in terms of its quantity and quality). Men and women (N = 230) who were 1 to 3 years posttransplant completed measures of partner support quantity (Manne & Schnoll, 2001), partner social support effectiveness (Rini & Dunkel Schetter, 2010), and psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory; Derogatis & Spencer, 1982). Potential medical and sociodemographic confounds were controlled in analyses. Results: As hypothesized, survivors reported less distress when they received more effective partner support (p < .001). Quantity of partner support was not associated with distress (p = .23). An interaction revealed that when partner support was effective, the quantity of support survivors received was not associated with their distress (p = .90); however, when partner support was ineffective, receiving a greater quantity of partner support was associated with substantially elevated distress (p = .002). Conclusions: Findings suggest that clinical approaches to addressing or preventing enduring distress after HSCT should target features of partner support related to its appraised effectiveness.
AB - Objective: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) survivors who are 1 to 3 years posttransplant are challenged by the need to resume valued social roles and activities - a task that may be complicated by enduring transplant-related psychological distress common in this patient population. The present study investigated whether transplant survivors who receive adequate social support from their spouse or intimate partner experience lower distress. Method: Effects of receiving a greater quantity of partner support (a common approach to studying enacted support) were compared with effects of receiving more effective partner support (i.e., support that more closely matches their needs in terms of its quantity and quality). Men and women (N = 230) who were 1 to 3 years posttransplant completed measures of partner support quantity (Manne & Schnoll, 2001), partner social support effectiveness (Rini & Dunkel Schetter, 2010), and psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory; Derogatis & Spencer, 1982). Potential medical and sociodemographic confounds were controlled in analyses. Results: As hypothesized, survivors reported less distress when they received more effective partner support (p < .001). Quantity of partner support was not associated with distress (p = .23). An interaction revealed that when partner support was effective, the quantity of support survivors received was not associated with their distress (p = .90); however, when partner support was ineffective, receiving a greater quantity of partner support was associated with substantially elevated distress (p = .002). Conclusions: Findings suggest that clinical approaches to addressing or preventing enduring distress after HSCT should target features of partner support related to its appraised effectiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79851500372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79851500372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0022199
DO - 10.1037/a0022199
M3 - Article
C2 - 21261435
AN - SCOPUS:79851500372
SN - 0022-006X
VL - 79
SP - 64
EP - 74
JO - Journal of Consulting Psychology
JF - Journal of Consulting Psychology
IS - 1
ER -