TY - GEN
T1 - Effects of curvature on spacecraft propellant management surface tension screen capillary capability
AU - MacEachron, Phil
AU - Alexander, Emma
AU - Khan, Nafeesa
AU - Randeria, Manjari
AU - Braun, Jonathan P.
AU - Edwards-Stewart, Christine
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was completed as part of the NASA Systems Engineering Educational Discovery (SEED) program; a joint effort involving the NASA Johnson Space Center, Yale University, and Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company. Christine Stewart, Jonathan Braun, and Dr. Steven Irons served as the principal investigator, subject matter expert, and Yale faculty advisor, respectively. The student flight team consisted of Emma Alexander, Michael Cruciger, Phillip MacEachron, Nafeesa Khan, and Sarah Flintgruber. Ground operations were supported by Manjari Randeria. Student researchers included Noah Conally, Brianna Chrisman, Katherine Lawrence, Zachary Brunt, and Joseph O’Rourke. Funding for this work was provided by the NASA SEED program, the Connecticut Space Grant Consortium, and the Yale physics and engineering departments. Test materials and technical review was provided by Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by Lockheed Martin Corporation.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In the development and operations of spacecraft, the application of a propellant management device, or PMD, is one solution to mitigate propellant slosh and deliver gas-free propellant to the system’s engines. PMDs range in complexity and are unique to every propulsion system, but a large subset of PMDs use surface tensions screens to directly control the location of gas, and indirectly the location of the liquid, in the tank. The limiting capability of any surface tension screen is defined by its “bubble point,” or the differential pressure at which the surface tension of the liquid propellant on the screen breaks and gas bubbles through. The propellant management community has identified that curving a surface tension screen alters its bubble point, but the effect of curvature isn’t easily quantified and the problem is typically overcome by overdesigning the system to ensure its proper function. This overdesign can cost the system in terms of weight, money, performance, and general uncertainty. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the effects of curvature on the bubble point of several typical types of surface tension screen. Through NASA’s SEED program, the bubble point was tested in a microgravity environment for three screen types at four different curvatures. The microgravity environment enabled uniform pressure across the screens, so that the bubble point was tested across the entire screen’s surface. Even though the data is noisy, the results show a trend in sensitivity of the bubble point, with a notable degradation in performance as the screen curvature increases. Method, testing procedure, and lessons learned are discussed. The resulting curves from the data of this project can potentially help in PMD design efforts and give insight into this important on-orbit effect.
AB - In the development and operations of spacecraft, the application of a propellant management device, or PMD, is one solution to mitigate propellant slosh and deliver gas-free propellant to the system’s engines. PMDs range in complexity and are unique to every propulsion system, but a large subset of PMDs use surface tensions screens to directly control the location of gas, and indirectly the location of the liquid, in the tank. The limiting capability of any surface tension screen is defined by its “bubble point,” or the differential pressure at which the surface tension of the liquid propellant on the screen breaks and gas bubbles through. The propellant management community has identified that curving a surface tension screen alters its bubble point, but the effect of curvature isn’t easily quantified and the problem is typically overcome by overdesigning the system to ensure its proper function. This overdesign can cost the system in terms of weight, money, performance, and general uncertainty. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the effects of curvature on the bubble point of several typical types of surface tension screen. Through NASA’s SEED program, the bubble point was tested in a microgravity environment for three screen types at four different curvatures. The microgravity environment enabled uniform pressure across the screens, so that the bubble point was tested across the entire screen’s surface. Even though the data is noisy, the results show a trend in sensitivity of the bubble point, with a notable degradation in performance as the screen curvature increases. Method, testing procedure, and lessons learned are discussed. The resulting curves from the data of this project can potentially help in PMD design efforts and give insight into this important on-orbit effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913573002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913573002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2014-3996
DO - 10.2514/6.2014-3996
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84913573002
T3 - 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2014
BT - 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2014
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
T2 - 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and exhibit 2014
Y2 - 28 July 2014 through 30 July 2014
ER -