TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota
AU - Hale, Vanessa L.
AU - Tan, Chia L.
AU - Niu, Kefeng
AU - Yang, Yeqin
AU - Cui, Duoying
AU - Zhao, Hongxia
AU - Knight, Rob
AU - Amato, Katherine R.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are very grateful to the Columbian Park Zoo, Beijing Zoo and the Wildlife Rescue Center of Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve for providing the monkey feces used in this study. Krista Nichols kindly provided laboratory space for the molecular work at Purdue University. We also offer sincere thanks to Richard D. Howard for his support, guidance, and review of this manuscript. Our gratitude additionally goes to Bong Suk-Kim and Gaenna Rogers and Qikun Zhang for their help and guidance in the laboratory. The suggestions provided by the reviewer for this manuscript were also extremely insightful and helpful. This project was funded by San Diego Zoo Global , the Offield Family Foundation , the Earth Microbiome Project , Morris Animal Foundation and the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation . We also thank the Howard Hughes Medical Institute for their support. VLH was supported by a Purdue University Andrews Fellowship and a Purdue Research Foundation Research Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Gut microbiota can provide great insight into host health, and studies of the gut microbiota in wildlife are becoming more common. However, the effects of field conditions on gut microbial samples are unknown. This study addresses the following questions: 1) How do environmental factors such as sunlight and insect infestations affect fecal microbial DNA? 2) How does fecal microbial DNA change over time after defecation? 3) How does storage method affect microbial DNA? Fresh fecal samples were collected, pooled, and homogenized from a family group of 6 spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi. Samples were then aliquoted and subjected to varying light conditions (shade, sun), insect infestations (limited or not limited by netting over the sample), and sample preservation methods (FTA — Fast Technology for Analysis of nucleic acid — cards, or freezing in liquid nitrogen then storing at − 20 °C). Changes in the microbial communities under these conditions were assessed over 24 h. Time and preservation method both effected fecal microbial community diversity and composition. The effect size of these variables was then assessed in relation to fecal microbial samples from 2 other primate species (Rhinopithecus bieti and R. brelichi) housed at different captive institutions. While the microbial community of each primate species was significantly different, the effects of time and preservation method still remained significant indicating that these effects are important considerations for fieldwork.
AB - Gut microbiota can provide great insight into host health, and studies of the gut microbiota in wildlife are becoming more common. However, the effects of field conditions on gut microbial samples are unknown. This study addresses the following questions: 1) How do environmental factors such as sunlight and insect infestations affect fecal microbial DNA? 2) How does fecal microbial DNA change over time after defecation? 3) How does storage method affect microbial DNA? Fresh fecal samples were collected, pooled, and homogenized from a family group of 6 spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi. Samples were then aliquoted and subjected to varying light conditions (shade, sun), insect infestations (limited or not limited by netting over the sample), and sample preservation methods (FTA — Fast Technology for Analysis of nucleic acid — cards, or freezing in liquid nitrogen then storing at − 20 °C). Changes in the microbial communities under these conditions were assessed over 24 h. Time and preservation method both effected fecal microbial community diversity and composition. The effect size of these variables was then assessed in relation to fecal microbial samples from 2 other primate species (Rhinopithecus bieti and R. brelichi) housed at different captive institutions. While the microbial community of each primate species was significantly different, the effects of time and preservation method still remained significant indicating that these effects are important considerations for fieldwork.
KW - Environmental conditions
KW - Fecal microbial community
KW - Fecal preservation
KW - Gut microbiota
KW - Primates
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988936631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988936631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.017
DO - 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 27686380
AN - SCOPUS:84988936631
SN - 0167-7012
VL - 130
SP - 180
EP - 188
JO - Journal of Microbiological Methods
JF - Journal of Microbiological Methods
ER -