Abstract
While much is known about reflex and mechanical contributions to the control of head stability, little is known about predictive control. The goal of this experiment was to determine the contribution of predictive mechanisms to head stability in space, in the pitch plane, during forward trunk perturbations. Eleven standing healthy subjects had their trunk pulled forward by a load-pulley apparatus. The perturbation was either self-triggered or imposed (triggered by the experimenter). Subjects were exposed to two loads: 2% and 4% of their body weight. The contributions of torques acting on the head-neck system were inferred from head and trunk kinematics, neck muscle EMG, and the torques acting on the head, which were computed using inverse dynamics. The results showed that both the head and trunk moved less during the self-triggered than imposed condition during both loads for most of the participants. There was no evidence of predictive neck countertorque or increased neck muscle co-contraction during the self-triggered condition. These findings suggest that most of the subjects improved head stability in the self-triggered condition by reducing trunk motion and the associated interactive torque that perturbed the head.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 338-349 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Experimental Brain Research |
Volume | 148 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2003 |
Funding
Acknowledgements This study was supported by a grant from the public health service (NIH/NINDS RO1 NS38286) as well as FRSQ-Québec (postdoctoral fellowship to M.S.). M.S. is now at Laval University Medical School, Division of Kinesiology, Québec, Canada.
Keywords
- Head stability
- Predictive control
- Trunk control
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience