TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of standardized outreach for patients refusing preventive services
T2 - A quasiexperimental quality improvement study
AU - Persell, Stephen D.
AU - Friesema, Elisha M.
AU - Dolan, Nancy C.
AU - Thompson, Jason A.
AU - Kaiser, Darren
AU - Baker, David W.
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Objective: To determine the effect of standardized outreach on the receipt of preventive services for patients whose physicians record that the patient refused the service. Study Design: Prospective observational study of a quality improvement intervention using a nonrandomly assigned comparator group. Methods: Patients from a large internal medicine practice with recorded refusals to preventive services were included. A nonclinician care manager mailed plain-language educational brochures, attempted telephone contact, and provided logistical assistance. The primary patient outcome was the time from refusal to first receipt of a refused service (colorectal cancer screening, breast cancer screening [mammography], cervical cancer screening, osteoporosis screening [bone density testing], or pneumococcal vaccination). We compared the time to completion of refused sevices during the period when outreach was performed (February 8, 2008, to November 25, 2008 [outreach cohort]), and during a subsequent period when refusals were recorded but no outreach was performed (November 26, 2008, to December 1, 2009 [nonintervention cohort]), using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for patient characteristics. We recorded the time spent performing outreach. Results: In total, 407 patients refused 520 preventive services in the outreach cohort, and 378 patients refused 510 services in the nonintervention cohort. After 6 months of follow-up, 6.1% of the outreach cohort and 4.8% of the nonintervention cohort had received a refused service (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.5). The care manager spent 214 hours performing the outreach. Conclusions: Standardized educational outreach was not a promising strategy for improving preventive services use among patients who have refused services recommended by their physician. The amount of time required to perform the outreach was substantial.
AB - Objective: To determine the effect of standardized outreach on the receipt of preventive services for patients whose physicians record that the patient refused the service. Study Design: Prospective observational study of a quality improvement intervention using a nonrandomly assigned comparator group. Methods: Patients from a large internal medicine practice with recorded refusals to preventive services were included. A nonclinician care manager mailed plain-language educational brochures, attempted telephone contact, and provided logistical assistance. The primary patient outcome was the time from refusal to first receipt of a refused service (colorectal cancer screening, breast cancer screening [mammography], cervical cancer screening, osteoporosis screening [bone density testing], or pneumococcal vaccination). We compared the time to completion of refused sevices during the period when outreach was performed (February 8, 2008, to November 25, 2008 [outreach cohort]), and during a subsequent period when refusals were recorded but no outreach was performed (November 26, 2008, to December 1, 2009 [nonintervention cohort]), using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for patient characteristics. We recorded the time spent performing outreach. Results: In total, 407 patients refused 520 preventive services in the outreach cohort, and 378 patients refused 510 services in the nonintervention cohort. After 6 months of follow-up, 6.1% of the outreach cohort and 4.8% of the nonintervention cohort had received a refused service (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.5). The care manager spent 214 hours performing the outreach. Conclusions: Standardized educational outreach was not a promising strategy for improving preventive services use among patients who have refused services recommended by their physician. The amount of time required to perform the outreach was substantial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960760181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960760181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 21819171
AN - SCOPUS:79960760181
SN - 1088-0224
VL - 17
SP - e249-e254
JO - American Journal of Managed Care
JF - American Journal of Managed Care
IS - 7
ER -
