TY - GEN
T1 - Effects of tool positions in accumulated double-sided incremental forming on part geometry
AU - Ren, Huaqing
AU - Moser, Newell
AU - Zhang, Zixuan
AU - Ndip-Agbor, Ebot
AU - Smith, Jacob
AU - Ehmann, Kornel F.
AU - Cao, Jian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by ASME.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - In Accumulated Double-Sided Incremental Forming (ADSIF), two hemispherical tools impart the local deformation to the sheet via their programmed in-plane spiral motion and the depth of the part is achieved via rigid body motion of the already formed part. Unlike Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) and Double-Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF), ADSIF does not impose forces on the already-formed part and therefore, has the potential of achieving higher geometric accuracy. A systematic method is proposed in this work to study the influences of the relative tool positions on the local formed shape and the final geometry, which is essentially the accumulation of all previously formed local deformations. Meanwhile, the concepts of the stable angle and the peak angle are introduced to better describe the cross-sectional geometry of a formed part with a constant wall angle at that particular cross-section. It is recommended, while multiple combinations of the relative positions of two forming tools may achieve the same stable angle, that the positioning parameters should be chosen such that the resultant forming force or the wall angle variation between the stable and peak angles is minimized.
AB - In Accumulated Double-Sided Incremental Forming (ADSIF), two hemispherical tools impart the local deformation to the sheet via their programmed in-plane spiral motion and the depth of the part is achieved via rigid body motion of the already formed part. Unlike Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) and Double-Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF), ADSIF does not impose forces on the already-formed part and therefore, has the potential of achieving higher geometric accuracy. A systematic method is proposed in this work to study the influences of the relative tool positions on the local formed shape and the final geometry, which is essentially the accumulation of all previously formed local deformations. Meanwhile, the concepts of the stable angle and the peak angle are introduced to better describe the cross-sectional geometry of a formed part with a constant wall angle at that particular cross-section. It is recommended, while multiple combinations of the relative positions of two forming tools may achieve the same stable angle, that the positioning parameters should be chosen such that the resultant forming force or the wall angle variation between the stable and peak angles is minimized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945341942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945341942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84945341942
T3 - ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, MSEC 2015
BT - Processing
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
T2 - ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, MSEC 2015
Y2 - 8 June 2015 through 12 June 2015
ER -