Efficacy of Mobocertinib and Amivantamab in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertions Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Indirect Treatment Comparison

Sai Hong Ignatius Ou, Thibaud Prawitz, Huamao M. Lin*, Jin liern Hong, Min Tan, Irina Proskorovsky, Luis Hernandez, Shu Jin, Pingkuan Zhang, Jianchang Lin, Jyoti Patel, Danny Nguyen, Joel W. Neal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations of the EGFR gene account for 1% to 2% of all non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Targeted therapies have been developed to treat this cancer type but have not been studied in head-to-head trials. Our objective was to use a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib and amivantamab in patients with NSCLC EGFR ex20ins mutations who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: An unanchored MAIC was conducted to estimate the treatment effects of mobocertinib and amivantamab using individual-level data from the mobocertinib phase I/II single-arm trial (NCT02716116) and published data from the amivantamab single-arm CHRYSALIS trial (NCT02609776). Confirmed overall response rate (cORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) were assessed. Results: Both trials were comparable in terms of study population, study design, and outcome definitions and included 114 patients who received mobocertinib and 114 patients who received amivantamab. After MAIC weighting, all reported baseline characteristics were balanced between mobocertinib and amivantamab. The weighted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.56 (0.30-1.04) for independent review committee (IRC)-assessed cORR and 0.98 (0.53-1.82) for investigator (INV)-assessed cORR. The weighted hazard ratio (HR) comparing mobocertinib to amivantamab was 0.74 (0.51-1.07) for IRC-assessed PFS, 0.92 (0.57-1.48) for OS, and 0.59 (0.30-1.18) for INV-assessed DoR. Conclusion: MAIC analysis showed that mobocertinib and amivantamab had similar efficacy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations whose disease progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may benefit patients by supporting future treatment options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e145-e152.e3
JournalClinical Lung Cancer
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Funding

Professional medical writing assistance was provided by Phillip S. Leventhal, Holly Richendrfer, and Stephen Gilliver of Evidera and was funded by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc .

Keywords

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor
  • Exon 20 insertion mutation
  • Matching-adjusted indirect comparison
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Targeted therapies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of Mobocertinib and Amivantamab in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertions Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Indirect Treatment Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this