TY - JOUR
T1 - Elastography in chronic liver disease
T2 - Modalities, techniques, limitations, and future directions
AU - Babu, Aparna Srinivasa
AU - Wells, Michael L.
AU - Teytelboym, Oleg M.
AU - Mackey, Justin E.
AU - Miller, Frank H.
AU - Yeh, Benjamin M.
AU - Ehman, Richard L.
AU - Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2016.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Chronic liver disease has multiple causes, many of which are increasing in prevalence. The final common pathway of chronic liver diseasis tissue destruction and attempted regeneration, a pathway that triggers fibrosis and eventual cirrhosis. Assessment of fibrosis is important not only for diagnosis but also for management, prognostic evauation, and follow-up of patients with chronic liver disease. Althougliver biopsy has traditionally been considered the reference standard for assessment of liver fibrosis, noninvasive techniques are the emerging focus in this field. Ultrasound-based elastography and magnetic resonance (MR) elastography are gaining popularity as the modalities of choice for quantifying hepatic fibrosis. These techniques have been proven superior to conventional cross-sectional imaging for evaluation of fibrosis, especially in the precirrhotic stages. Moreoverelastography has added utility in the follow-up of previously diagnosed fibrosis, the assessment of treatment response, evaluation for the presence of portal hypertension (spleen elastography), and evaluation of patients with unexplained portal hypertension. In this article, a brief overview is provided of chronic liver disease and the tools used for its diagnosis. Ultrasound-based elastography and MR elastography are explored in depth, including a brief glimpse into thevolution of elastography. Elastography is based on the principle of measuring tissue response to a known mechanical stimulus. Specific elastographic techniques used to exploit this principle include MR elastography and ultrasonography-based static or quasistatic strain imaging, one-dimensional transient elastography, point shear-wave elastography, and supersonic shear-wave elastography. The advantages, limitations, and pitfalls of each modality are emphasized.
AB - Chronic liver disease has multiple causes, many of which are increasing in prevalence. The final common pathway of chronic liver diseasis tissue destruction and attempted regeneration, a pathway that triggers fibrosis and eventual cirrhosis. Assessment of fibrosis is important not only for diagnosis but also for management, prognostic evauation, and follow-up of patients with chronic liver disease. Althougliver biopsy has traditionally been considered the reference standard for assessment of liver fibrosis, noninvasive techniques are the emerging focus in this field. Ultrasound-based elastography and magnetic resonance (MR) elastography are gaining popularity as the modalities of choice for quantifying hepatic fibrosis. These techniques have been proven superior to conventional cross-sectional imaging for evaluation of fibrosis, especially in the precirrhotic stages. Moreoverelastography has added utility in the follow-up of previously diagnosed fibrosis, the assessment of treatment response, evaluation for the presence of portal hypertension (spleen elastography), and evaluation of patients with unexplained portal hypertension. In this article, a brief overview is provided of chronic liver disease and the tools used for its diagnosis. Ultrasound-based elastography and MR elastography are explored in depth, including a brief glimpse into thevolution of elastography. Elastography is based on the principle of measuring tissue response to a known mechanical stimulus. Specific elastographic techniques used to exploit this principle include MR elastography and ultrasonography-based static or quasistatic strain imaging, one-dimensional transient elastography, point shear-wave elastography, and supersonic shear-wave elastography. The advantages, limitations, and pitfalls of each modality are emphasized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994908957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994908957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/rg.2016160042
DO - 10.1148/rg.2016160042
M3 - Article
C2 - 27689833
AN - SCOPUS:84994908957
SN - 0271-5333
VL - 36
SP - 1987
EP - 2006
JO - Radiographics
JF - Radiographics
IS - 7
ER -