TY - JOUR
T1 - Emergency department quality
T2 - An analysis of existing pediatric measures
AU - Alessandrini, Evaline
AU - Varadarajan, Kartik
AU - Alpern, Elizabeth R.
AU - Gorelick, Marc H.
AU - Shaw, Kathy
AU - Ruddy, Richard M.
AU - Chamberlain, James M.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Objectives: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has recommended the development of national standards for the measurement of emergency care performance. The authors undertook this study with the goals of enumerating and categorizing existing performance measures relevant to pediatric emergency care. Methods: Potential performance measures were identified through a survey of 1) the peer-reviewed literature, 2) websites of organizations and societies pertaining to quality improvement, and 3) emergency department (ED) directors. Performance measures were enumerated and categorized, using consensus methods, on three dimensions: 1) the IOM quality domains; 2) Donabedian's structure/process/ outcome framework; and 3) general, cross-cutting, or disease-specific measures. Results: A total of 405 performance measures were found for potential use for pediatric emergency care. When categorized by IOM domain, nearly half of the measures were related to effectiveness, while only 6% of measures addressed patient-centeredness. In the Donabedian dimension, 67% of measures were categorized as process measures, with 29% outcome and 4% structure measures. Finally, 31% of measures were general measures relevant to every ED visit. Although 225 measures (55%) were disease-specific, the majority (56%) of these measures related to only five common conditions. Conclusions: A wide range of performance measures relevant to pediatric emergency care are available. However, measures lack a systematic and comprehensive approach to evaluate the quality of care provided.
AB - Objectives: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has recommended the development of national standards for the measurement of emergency care performance. The authors undertook this study with the goals of enumerating and categorizing existing performance measures relevant to pediatric emergency care. Methods: Potential performance measures were identified through a survey of 1) the peer-reviewed literature, 2) websites of organizations and societies pertaining to quality improvement, and 3) emergency department (ED) directors. Performance measures were enumerated and categorized, using consensus methods, on three dimensions: 1) the IOM quality domains; 2) Donabedian's structure/process/ outcome framework; and 3) general, cross-cutting, or disease-specific measures. Results: A total of 405 performance measures were found for potential use for pediatric emergency care. When categorized by IOM domain, nearly half of the measures were related to effectiveness, while only 6% of measures addressed patient-centeredness. In the Donabedian dimension, 67% of measures were categorized as process measures, with 29% outcome and 4% structure measures. Finally, 31% of measures were general measures relevant to every ED visit. Although 225 measures (55%) were disease-specific, the majority (56%) of these measures related to only five common conditions. Conclusions: A wide range of performance measures relevant to pediatric emergency care are available. However, measures lack a systematic and comprehensive approach to evaluate the quality of care provided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956132286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956132286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01057.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01057.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21569170
AN - SCOPUS:79956132286
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 18
SP - 519
EP - 526
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 5
ER -