Emergency Department Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy for Dizziness and Vertigo: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Howard S. Kim, Jacob M. Schauer, Ann K. Kan, Joshua B. Alinger, Kyle J. Strickland, Alexander Garreau, Danielle M. McCarthy, Zachary B. Taylor, Ivy L. Fishman, Kayla M. Muschong, Heidi R. Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance: Dizziness symptoms account for nearly 2 million annual emergency department (ED) visits and present a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Most dizziness research has focused on improving guideline-concordant care among clinicians, with little focus on developing patient-centered interventions to improve dizziness-related disability. Objective: To examine the feasibility of ED vestibular rehabilitation therapy (ED-VeRT) using a protocolized diagnostic classification algorithm and collection of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pilot nonrandomized clinical trial of ED-VeRT vs usual care for patients presenting to the ED with dizziness at a single urban US ED was conducted from November 16, 2021, to February 6, 2023, with collection of 3-month outcomes through May 1, 2023. Patients were allocated to ED-VeRT or usual care at the discretion of the treating physician. Interventions: Use of ED-VeRT was delivered by an ED physical therapist via a protocolized diagnostic classification and treatment algorithm based on a diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, triggered undifferentiated dizziness, spontaneous undifferentiated dizziness, or unilateral peripheral hypofunction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility outcomes included participant screening, enrollment, and retention rates to inform the design of a future randomized clinical trial; retention was defined as completing any of 4 follow-up surveys over 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was change in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score; the secondary efficacy outcome was change in the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Inventory-9 score. Results: Of 366 patients screened, 125 participants were enrolled (median age, 52 [IQR, 40-66] years, 73 [58%] female, 61 [49%] White), and 105 retained (84.0%) in longitudinal data collection. Sixty-three participants (50.4%) received ED vestibular therapy and were assigned to primary diagnostic classifications of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (23 [37.1%]), triggered undifferentiated dizziness (14 [22.6%]), spontaneous undifferentiated dizziness (14 [22.6%]), or unilateral peripheral hypofunction (9 [14.5%]). Despite having higher Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Vestibular Activities Avoidance Inventory scores at baseline, ED-VeRT participants reported lower dizziness handicap (difference: -1.68; 95% CI, -11.30 to 7.90) and vestibular activities avoidance (difference: -2.27; 95% CI, -8.40 to 3.86) at 3 months, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, ED vestibular therapy was feasibly delivered to patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated dizziness symptoms. For participants receiving vestibular therapy the findings for dizziness-related disability over 3 months were not statistically significant, pointing to the need for a fully powered randomized clinical trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05122663.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e2459567
JournalJAMA network open
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency Department Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy for Dizziness and Vertigo: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this