Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices

A Mixed Methods Study

Lisa A. Wolf*, Altair M. Delao, Cydne Perhats, Paul R. Clark, Michael D. Moon, Kathleen Evanovich Zavotsky, Zoran Martinovich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73% of all homicides and 50% of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. Methods: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. Results: Between 21.8 and 43.5% of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. Discussion: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-66.e2
JournalJournal of Emergency Nursing
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Firearms
Emergencies
Nurses
Wounds and Injuries
Focus Groups
Counseling
Safety
Continuity of Patient Care
Homicide
Patient Safety
Risk-Taking
Workplace
Suicide
Hospital Emergency Service
Education
Population

Keywords

  • Emergency care
  • Firearms
  • Lethal means assessment
  • Mixed methods
  • Nursing workload
  • Workplace safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency

Cite this

Wolf, Lisa A. ; Delao, Altair M. ; Perhats, Cydne ; Clark, Paul R. ; Moon, Michael D. ; Zavotsky, Kathleen Evanovich ; Martinovich, Zoran. / Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices : A Mixed Methods Study. In: Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 54-66.e2.
@article{0a4289e8b9074746b71ed59c1b057feb,
title = "Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices: A Mixed Methods Study",
abstract = "Introduction: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73{\%} of all homicides and 50{\%} of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. Methods: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. Results: Between 21.8 and 43.5{\%} of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. Discussion: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.",
keywords = "Emergency care, Firearms, Lethal means assessment, Mixed methods, Nursing workload, Workplace safety",
author = "Wolf, {Lisa A.} and Delao, {Altair M.} and Cydne Perhats and Clark, {Paul R.} and Moon, {Michael D.} and Zavotsky, {Kathleen Evanovich} and Zoran Martinovich",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jen.2018.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "54--66.e2",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Nursing",
issn = "0099-1767",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices : A Mixed Methods Study. / Wolf, Lisa A.; Delao, Altair M.; Perhats, Cydne; Clark, Paul R.; Moon, Michael D.; Zavotsky, Kathleen Evanovich; Martinovich, Zoran.

In: Journal of Emergency Nursing, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 54-66.e2.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices

T2 - A Mixed Methods Study

AU - Wolf, Lisa A.

AU - Delao, Altair M.

AU - Perhats, Cydne

AU - Clark, Paul R.

AU - Moon, Michael D.

AU - Zavotsky, Kathleen Evanovich

AU - Martinovich, Zoran

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73% of all homicides and 50% of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. Methods: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. Results: Between 21.8 and 43.5% of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. Discussion: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.

AB - Introduction: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73% of all homicides and 50% of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. Methods: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. Results: Between 21.8 and 43.5% of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. Discussion: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.

KW - Emergency care

KW - Firearms

KW - Lethal means assessment

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Nursing workload

KW - Workplace safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055271339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055271339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jen.2018.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jen.2018.09.010

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 54-66.e2

JO - Journal of Emergency Nursing

JF - Journal of Emergency Nursing

SN - 0099-1767

IS - 1

ER -