Emergency Physician Practice Changes After Being Named in a Malpractice Claim

Jestin N. Carlson, Krista M. Foster, Bernard S. Black, Jesse M. Pines, Christopher K. Corbit, Arvind Venkat*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study objective: Malpractice fear is a commonly cited cause for defensive medicine, but it is unclear whether being named in a malpractice claim changes physician practice patterns. We study whether there are changes in commonly used measures of emergency physician practice after being named in a malpractice claim. Methods: We performed a retrospective difference-in-differences study comparing practice patterns of emergency physicians named in a malpractice claim and unnamed matched controls working contemporaneously in the same emergency departments (EDs), using data from a national emergency medicine management group (59 EDs in 11 US states from 2010 to 2015). We studied aggregate measures of care intensity (hospital admission rate and relative value units/visit), studied care speed (relative value units/hour and discharged patients’ length of stay), and assessed patient experience (monthly physician Press Ganey percentile rank). Results: A total of 65 emergency physicians named in at least 1 malpractice claim and 140 matched controls met inclusion criteria. After the malpractice claim filing date, there were no significant changes in measures of care intensity or speed. However, named emergency physicians’ patient experience scores improved immediately after the malpractice claim filing date and showed sustained improvements by 6.52 Press Ganey percentile ranks (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 12.38), with the increase most prominent among those involved in the 46 failure-to-diagnose claims (10.52; 95% confidence interval 3.72 to 17.32). Conclusion: We observed a temporal improvement in patient satisfaction scores for emergency physicians in this sample after their being named in a malpractice claim relative to matched controls. Measures of care intensity and speed did not significantly change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-235
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this