Abstract
Emerging research shows that distancing one’s language by reducing the use of “I” and present-tense verbs is associated with more successful emotion regulation. However, construal level theory posits that increasing psychological distance should also shift mental representations to be more abstract. Here, we test whether successful emotion regulation is related to linguistic measures of both abstractness and psychological distance in two emotion regulation experiments reported previously (N1 = 217, N2 = 464). As hypothesized, we found that (i) linguistic measures of psychological distancing and abstractness were highly correlated, (ii) linguistic abstractness increased when people used cognitive reappraisal strategies to regulate their responses to negative images, (iii) instructing participants to distance their language by not using the word “I” increased linguistic abstractness, and (iv) the extent to which people made their language more abstract while regulating correlated with regulation success. These results extend theoretical arguments that psychological distance and abstract construals are strongly connected in the mind. Furthermore, they provide novel evidence that successful cognitive reappraisal is associated with more abstract representations of stimuli and that this cognitive shift can be achieved merely by shifting one’s language.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Affective Science |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Funding
Thanks to Daniela Feingold, Erin Guty, Amanda Heffernan, and Cambria Litsey for assistance with text data proofreading. Financial support was provided by a Harvard University small grant and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to ECN (DGE1144152).
Keywords
- Abstractness
- Construal level theory
- Emotion regulation
- Language
- Linguistic distance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Social Psychology