TY - JOUR
T1 - Empowering Bystanders to Intervene
T2 - Trauma Responders Unify to Empower (TRUE) Communities
AU - Tatebe, Leah
AU - Speedy, Sedona
AU - Kang, Danby
AU - Barnum, Trevor
AU - Cosey-Gay, Franklin
AU - Regan, Sheila
AU - Stone, Le Von
AU - Swaroop, Mamta
N1 - Funding Information:
A prospective development and implementation project to improve bystander trauma first-aid training in the Chicago area called the Trauma Responders Unify to Empower (TRUE) Communities Course was created. The health belief model was utilized in the development stage to identify barriers to bystander interventions within our community. 18-20 We then utilized evidence-based empowerment techniques to address competence, capacity, barriers, and support. 21 After performing multiple focus groups with key stakeholders from across the city, essential skills were identified to provide the most impact for the needs of the community, including hemorrhage control, scene safety, victim positioning and movement, and mitigating the psychological impact of trauma at the scene. Using McNemar's Test, our target recruitment was determined to be approximately 500 participants. A 3-h course was developed involving a didactic session as well as hands-on skills training. The outline of the course is included as Supplemental Material . Courses began in January 2017, and target enrollment was reached in April 2018. The majority of courses were held in the community setting, including local schools, churches, and community centers. Participants were recruited through collaborations with community groups, flyer distribution, word-of-mouth, and social media campaigns. At the start of the course, participants were provided with a precourse survey, querying age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, neighborhood, employment, and previous first-aid training experience. In addition, several questions were asked pertaining to impressions of overall safety and previous injury exposure. Seven self-efficacy empowerment questions and one personal safety question were developed to capture key concerns identified in community focus groups on a 1-10 scale. To measure participants' knowledge of trauma first aid, 10 multiple choice questions were included. Immediately following the course, participants were asked to complete a postcourse survey, containing the self-efficacy empowerment and knowledge components of the survey along with an evaluation of the course. Participants who consented at the initial course were then contacted 6 mo postcourse completion for an online follow-up questionnaire. The primary outcome was improvement in overall empowerment and knowledge scores postcourse. Secondary outcomes included retention of score improvement at 6 mo and utilization of the skills taught in the course in the community. The project received approval from the institutional review board. Funding support was obtained through the Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (Grant UL1TR001422). This grant was utilized to run focus groups and perform qualitative analysis, the results of which guided the design of the course. The Sadanah Foundation provided food for the courses. No specific funding support was used for the generation of the data presented here.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Background: Timely and effective bystander first aid can improve outcomes for trauma victims. Bystanders are present at most traumas and are more likely to assist with prior training. Materials and methods: An evidence-based course was created for the general public in high-risk Chicago neighborhoods focused on basic traumatic first aid, including scene management, hemorrhage control, and mitigating the psychological impact of trauma to overcome the bystander effect. Prospectively, participants completed knowledge-based and self-efficacy assessments precourse, postcourse, and 6 mo follow-up. The change in self-efficacy and knowledge scores was analyzed. Results: Over 32 courses, 503 participants were taught; 474 and 460 participants completed precourse and postcourse surveys, respectively, whereas 60 of 327 who consented for follow-up completed the 6-mo survey. Postcourse, participants were more likely to assist trauma victims and felt more confident in the quality of care they could provide; the effect remained significant at 6 mo (all P < 0.001). All seven self-efficacy empowerment-based questions individually demonstrated improvement from precourse to postcourse (P < 0.001), with an overall mean (SD) increase of 2.8 (2.1, P < 0.001); six maintained significance at follow-up with an overall mean increase of 2.8 (1.9, P < 0.001). Knowledge scores improved from 6.2 of 10 to 7.2 postcourse and 7.7 at follow-up (P < 0.001). Most improved were the ability to render first aid and apply tourniquets. Conclusions: The TFRC increased self-efficacy, successfully teaching initial trauma care, particularly hemorrhage control and scene safety, suggesting that a grassroots approach to trauma care may improve outcomes in communities that experience high violence rates.
AB - Background: Timely and effective bystander first aid can improve outcomes for trauma victims. Bystanders are present at most traumas and are more likely to assist with prior training. Materials and methods: An evidence-based course was created for the general public in high-risk Chicago neighborhoods focused on basic traumatic first aid, including scene management, hemorrhage control, and mitigating the psychological impact of trauma to overcome the bystander effect. Prospectively, participants completed knowledge-based and self-efficacy assessments precourse, postcourse, and 6 mo follow-up. The change in self-efficacy and knowledge scores was analyzed. Results: Over 32 courses, 503 participants were taught; 474 and 460 participants completed precourse and postcourse surveys, respectively, whereas 60 of 327 who consented for follow-up completed the 6-mo survey. Postcourse, participants were more likely to assist trauma victims and felt more confident in the quality of care they could provide; the effect remained significant at 6 mo (all P < 0.001). All seven self-efficacy empowerment-based questions individually demonstrated improvement from precourse to postcourse (P < 0.001), with an overall mean (SD) increase of 2.8 (2.1, P < 0.001); six maintained significance at follow-up with an overall mean increase of 2.8 (1.9, P < 0.001). Knowledge scores improved from 6.2 of 10 to 7.2 postcourse and 7.7 at follow-up (P < 0.001). Most improved were the ability to render first aid and apply tourniquets. Conclusions: The TFRC increased self-efficacy, successfully teaching initial trauma care, particularly hemorrhage control and scene safety, suggesting that a grassroots approach to trauma care may improve outcomes in communities that experience high violence rates.
KW - Bystander effect
KW - Immediate responders
KW - Self-efficacy
KW - Tourniquets
KW - Trauma care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063744597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063744597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 30954087
AN - SCOPUS:85063744597
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 238
SP - 255
EP - 264
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -