Endoloop as the first line tool for appendiceal stump closure in children with appendicitis

Jessica Naiditch, Timothy B Lautz, Anthony C Chin, Marybeth Browne, Erin Rowell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this study is to compare outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed either (1) using an endostapler (ES) to divide the appendix and mesoappendix or (2) using endoloops (ELs) to close the appendiceal stump and electrocautery to divide the mesoappendix. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent LA for suspected appendicitis 4 years at a free standing children's hospital. The use of EL and ES was compared separately in patients with perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes. Results There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative abscess, rate of subsequent small bowel obstruction requiring operation or rate of intraperitoneal hematoma between the ES and EL groups for both nonperforated and perforated appendectomy cases. Superficial wound infection was more common in the nonperforated EL group (17/309, 5.5%) than in the nonperforated ES group (2/235, 0.9%; p = 0.007). Operative time for the EL technique (52.2 ± 15.8 minutes; p = 0.047) was shorter than for the ES technique (58 ± 23.2 minutes) for patients with perforated appendicitis. Conclusion EL stump closure and mesoappendix cauterization during LA is safe and effective in children with appendicitis, including perforated appendicitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-159
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Appendicitis
Appendectomy
Cautery
Electrocoagulation
Wound Infection
Operative Time
Hematoma
Abscess
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • appendicitis
  • endoloop
  • nonperforated
  • perforated

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{e2eef4b46eaa45a4b05a7831d4d2cb26,
title = "Endoloop as the first line tool for appendiceal stump closure in children with appendicitis",
abstract = "Purpose The objective of this study is to compare outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed either (1) using an endostapler (ES) to divide the appendix and mesoappendix or (2) using endoloops (ELs) to close the appendiceal stump and electrocautery to divide the mesoappendix. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent LA for suspected appendicitis 4 years at a free standing children's hospital. The use of EL and ES was compared separately in patients with perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes. Results There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative abscess, rate of subsequent small bowel obstruction requiring operation or rate of intraperitoneal hematoma between the ES and EL groups for both nonperforated and perforated appendectomy cases. Superficial wound infection was more common in the nonperforated EL group (17/309, 5.5{\%}) than in the nonperforated ES group (2/235, 0.9{\%}; p = 0.007). Operative time for the EL technique (52.2 ± 15.8 minutes; p = 0.047) was shorter than for the ES technique (58 ± 23.2 minutes) for patients with perforated appendicitis. Conclusion EL stump closure and mesoappendix cauterization during LA is safe and effective in children with appendicitis, including perforated appendicitis.",
keywords = "appendicitis, endoloop, nonperforated, perforated",
author = "Jessica Naiditch and Lautz, {Timothy B} and Chin, {Anthony C} and Marybeth Browne and Erin Rowell",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0033-1360455",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "155--159",
journal = "European Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0939-7248",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "2",

}

Endoloop as the first line tool for appendiceal stump closure in children with appendicitis. / Naiditch, Jessica; Lautz, Timothy B; Chin, Anthony C; Browne, Marybeth; Rowell, Erin.

In: European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 155-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoloop as the first line tool for appendiceal stump closure in children with appendicitis

AU - Naiditch, Jessica

AU - Lautz, Timothy B

AU - Chin, Anthony C

AU - Browne, Marybeth

AU - Rowell, Erin

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Purpose The objective of this study is to compare outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed either (1) using an endostapler (ES) to divide the appendix and mesoappendix or (2) using endoloops (ELs) to close the appendiceal stump and electrocautery to divide the mesoappendix. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent LA for suspected appendicitis 4 years at a free standing children's hospital. The use of EL and ES was compared separately in patients with perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes. Results There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative abscess, rate of subsequent small bowel obstruction requiring operation or rate of intraperitoneal hematoma between the ES and EL groups for both nonperforated and perforated appendectomy cases. Superficial wound infection was more common in the nonperforated EL group (17/309, 5.5%) than in the nonperforated ES group (2/235, 0.9%; p = 0.007). Operative time for the EL technique (52.2 ± 15.8 minutes; p = 0.047) was shorter than for the ES technique (58 ± 23.2 minutes) for patients with perforated appendicitis. Conclusion EL stump closure and mesoappendix cauterization during LA is safe and effective in children with appendicitis, including perforated appendicitis.

AB - Purpose The objective of this study is to compare outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed either (1) using an endostapler (ES) to divide the appendix and mesoappendix or (2) using endoloops (ELs) to close the appendiceal stump and electrocautery to divide the mesoappendix. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent LA for suspected appendicitis 4 years at a free standing children's hospital. The use of EL and ES was compared separately in patients with perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes. Results There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative abscess, rate of subsequent small bowel obstruction requiring operation or rate of intraperitoneal hematoma between the ES and EL groups for both nonperforated and perforated appendectomy cases. Superficial wound infection was more common in the nonperforated EL group (17/309, 5.5%) than in the nonperforated ES group (2/235, 0.9%; p = 0.007). Operative time for the EL technique (52.2 ± 15.8 minutes; p = 0.047) was shorter than for the ES technique (58 ± 23.2 minutes) for patients with perforated appendicitis. Conclusion EL stump closure and mesoappendix cauterization during LA is safe and effective in children with appendicitis, including perforated appendicitis.

KW - appendicitis

KW - endoloop

KW - nonperforated

KW - perforated

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889768171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889768171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1360455

DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1360455

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 155

EP - 159

JO - European Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - European Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0939-7248

IS - 2

ER -