TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic submucosal dissection
AU - Maple, John T.
AU - Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
AU - Chauhan, Shailendra S.
AU - Hwang, Joo Ha
AU - Komanduri, Sri
AU - Manfredi, Michael
AU - Konda, Vani
AU - Murad, Faris M.
AU - Siddiqui, Uzma D.
AU - Banerjee, Subhas
AU - ASGE Technology Committee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - ESD is an established effective treatment modality for premalignant and early-stage malignant lesions of the stomach, esophagus, and colorectum. Compared with EMR, ESD is generally associated with higher rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resections and a lower rate of local recurrence. Oncologic outcomes with ESD compare favorably with competing surgical interventions, and ESD also serves as an excellent T-staging tool to identify noncurative resections that will require further treatment. ESD is technically demanding and has a higher rate of adverse events than most endoscopic procedures including EMR. As such, sufficient training is critical to ensure safe conduct and high-quality resections. A standardized training model for Western endoscopists has not been clearly established, but will be self-directed and include courses, animal model training, and optimally an observership at an expert center. Numerous dedicated ESD devices are now available in the United States from different manufacturers. Although the use of ESD in the United States is increasing, issues related to technical difficulty, limited training opportunities and mentors, risk of adverse events, long procedure duration, and suboptimal reimbursement may limit ESD adoption in the United States to a modest number of academic referral centers for the foreseeable future.
AB - ESD is an established effective treatment modality for premalignant and early-stage malignant lesions of the stomach, esophagus, and colorectum. Compared with EMR, ESD is generally associated with higher rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resections and a lower rate of local recurrence. Oncologic outcomes with ESD compare favorably with competing surgical interventions, and ESD also serves as an excellent T-staging tool to identify noncurative resections that will require further treatment. ESD is technically demanding and has a higher rate of adverse events than most endoscopic procedures including EMR. As such, sufficient training is critical to ensure safe conduct and high-quality resections. A standardized training model for Western endoscopists has not been clearly established, but will be self-directed and include courses, animal model training, and optimally an observership at an expert center. Numerous dedicated ESD devices are now available in the United States from different manufacturers. Although the use of ESD in the United States is increasing, issues related to technical difficulty, limited training opportunities and mentors, risk of adverse events, long procedure duration, and suboptimal reimbursement may limit ESD adoption in the United States to a modest number of academic referral centers for the foreseeable future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929606861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929606861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 25796422
AN - SCOPUS:84929606861
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 81
SP - 1311
EP - 1325
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -