TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy and Magnitude
T2 - A Historical Perspective
AU - Okal, Emile A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - We present a detailed historical review of early attempts to quantify seismic sources through a measure of the energy radiated into seismic waves, in connection with the parallel development of the concept of magnitude. In particular, we explore the derivation of the widely quoted “Gutenberg–Richter energy–magnitude relationship” log10E=1.5Ms+11.8(E in ergs), and especially the origin of the value 1.5 for the slope. By examining all of the relevant papers by Gutenberg and Richter, we note that estimates of this slope kept decreasing for more than 20 years before Gutenberg’s sudden death, and that the value 1.5 was obtained through the complex computation of an estimate of the energy flux above the hypocenter, based on a number of assumptions and models lacking robustness in the context of modern seismological theory. We emphasize that the scaling laws underlying this derivation, as well as previous relations with generally higher values of the slope, suffer violations by several classes of earthquakes, and we stress the significant scientific value of reporting radiated seismic energy independently of seismic moment (or of reporting several types of magnitude), in order to fully document the rich diversity of seismic sources.
AB - We present a detailed historical review of early attempts to quantify seismic sources through a measure of the energy radiated into seismic waves, in connection with the parallel development of the concept of magnitude. In particular, we explore the derivation of the widely quoted “Gutenberg–Richter energy–magnitude relationship” log10E=1.5Ms+11.8(E in ergs), and especially the origin of the value 1.5 for the slope. By examining all of the relevant papers by Gutenberg and Richter, we note that estimates of this slope kept decreasing for more than 20 years before Gutenberg’s sudden death, and that the value 1.5 was obtained through the complex computation of an estimate of the energy flux above the hypocenter, based on a number of assumptions and models lacking robustness in the context of modern seismological theory. We emphasize that the scaling laws underlying this derivation, as well as previous relations with generally higher values of the slope, suffer violations by several classes of earthquakes, and we stress the significant scientific value of reporting radiated seismic energy independently of seismic moment (or of reporting several types of magnitude), in order to fully document the rich diversity of seismic sources.
KW - Radiated seismic energy
KW - earthquake magnitudes
KW - historical seismicity
KW - seismic scaling laws
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062238944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062238944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00024-018-1994-7
DO - 10.1007/s00024-018-1994-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062238944
SN - 0033-4553
VL - 176
SP - 3815
EP - 3849
JO - Pure and Applied Geophysics
JF - Pure and Applied Geophysics
IS - 9
ER -