Epidemiology and long-term clinical and biologic risk factors for pneumonia in community-dwelling older Americans analysis of three cohorts

Sachin Yende*, Karina Alvarez, Laura Loehr, Aaron R. Folsom, Anne B. Newman, Lisa A. Weissfeld, Richard G. Wunderink, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Kenneth J. Mukamal, Stephanie J. London, Tamara B. Harris, Doug C. Bauer, Derek C. Angus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Preventing pneumonia requires better understanding of incidence, mortality, and long-term clinical and biologic risk factors, particularly in younger individuals. Methods: This was a cohort study in three population-based cohorts of community-dwelling individuals. A derivation cohort (n = 16,260) was used to determine incidence and survival and develop a risk prediction model. The prediction model was validated in two cohorts (n = 8,495). The primary outcome was 10-year risk of pneumonia hospitalization. Results: The crude and age-adjusted incidences of pneumonia were 6.71 and 9.43 cases/1,000 person-years (10-year risk was 6.15%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 16.5% and 31.5%. Although age was the most important risk factor (range of crude incidence rates, 1.69-39.13 cases/1,000 person-years for each 5-year increment from 45-85 years), 38% of pneumonia cases occurred in adults < 65 years of age. The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 12.5% and 25.7% in those < 65 years of age. Although most comorbidities were associated with higher risk of pneumonia, reduced lung function was the most important risk factor (relative risk = 6.61 for severe reduction based on FEV 1 by spirometry). A clinical risk prediction model based on age, smoking, and lung function predicted 10-year risk (area under curve [AUC] = 0.77 and Hosmer-Lemeshow [HL] C statistic = 0.12). Model discrimination and calibration were similar in the internal validation cohort (AUC = 0.77; HL C statistic, 0.65) but lower in the external validation cohort (AUC 5 0.62; HL C statistic, 0.45). The model also calibrated well in blacks and younger adults. C-reactive protein and IL-6 were associated with higher pneumonia risk but did not improve model performance. Conclusions: Pneumonia hospitalization is common and associated with high mortality, even in younger healthy adults. Long-term risk of pneumonia can be predicted in community-dwelling adults with a simple clinical risk prediction model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1008-1017
Number of pages10
JournalCHEST
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Funding

Funding/Support: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [ Contracts N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, and N01-HC-55022 ]. This research was supported by NHLBI [ Contracts HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01-HC-55222, N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85080, N01-HC-85081, N01-HC-85082, N01-HC-85083, H01-HC-85086 and Grant HL080295 ], with additional contribution from National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Additional support was provided by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) [ Grant AG-023629 ]. A full list of principal Cardiovascular Health Study investigators and institutions can be found at CHS-NHLBI.org . The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study is supported by NIA [Contracts N01-AG-6-2101, N01-AG-6-2103, N01-AG-6-2106, R01-AG028050, and R01-NR012459]. This study was in part funded by National Institutes of Health [Grant K23GM083215 to Dr Yende] and Intramural Research Programs of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and NIA.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiology and long-term clinical and biologic risk factors for pneumonia in community-dwelling older Americans analysis of three cohorts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this