Equilibrium incentives for exclusive dealing in a differentiated products oligopoly

David Besanko, Martin K. Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations


We consider the incentives for oligopolistic manufacturers to adopt exclusive dealing. Manufacturers producing differentiated brands can choose to distribute through exclusive retail dealerships or nonexclusive dealerships. With nonexclusive dealing, manufacturers face an interbrand externality because brand-enhancing investments made by one manufacturer may benefit the brands of other manufacturers. Although exclusive dealing eliminates this externality, oligopolistic manufacturers may not choose exclusive dealing. Exclusive dealing enhances the incentive to invest, but the promotional investments are a form of competition between manufacturers. Thus, manufacturers might earn higher profits with nonexclusive dealing making lower promotional investments. We find cases in which nonexclusive dealing is a dominant strategy. We also find cases in which some, but not all, manufacturers adopt exclusive dealing. Moreover, even if adoption of exclusive dealing by all manufacturers is the equilibrium, it can arise from a prisoner's dilemma in that each manufacturer would prefer nonexclusive dealing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)646-667
Number of pages22
JournalRAND Journal of Economics
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Equilibrium incentives for exclusive dealing in a differentiated products oligopoly'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this