Erratum to: Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates (Research Synthesis Methods, (2010), 1, 1, (39-65), 10.1002/jrsm.5)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

On pages 47–48, under the heading ‘Dependence Introduced by Study Level Effects’, the estimators of τ2 and ω2 given are incorrect. The correct estimators are as follows. Assume a covariance matrix of the form Σ=diag(Σ1, …, Σm), where (Figure presented.) where τ2 is the random between cluster variance, ω2 is the random within cluster between study variance, Ij is a kj × kj identity matrix, Jj is a kj × kj matrix of 1's, and Vj is the diagonal matrix of study level known variances. We let QE be the sum of squares provided in our original paper. That is, (Figure presented.) where Wj=V (Formula presented.). An additional sum of squares can be written (Figure presented.) where. Method of moments estimators of the parameters τ2 and ω2 can therefore be written, (Figure presented.) and (Figure presented.) where (Figure presented.) and p=rank(X), kj is the number of studies in cluster j and V=(X′WX)−1. As suggested in the paper, when either or are negative, their estimators are set equal to 0. Finally, please note that the R functions given in Appendix B contain several typesetting errors (which unfortunately we did not catch). We also did not include an R function for estimating the standard errors in a hierarchical model. In order to avoid new typographical errors, we have included correct (and updated) versions of both functions on our website, http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/qcenter/RVE-meta-analysis.html.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-165
Number of pages2
JournalResearch synthesis methods
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates (Research Synthesis Methods, (2010), 1, 1, (39-65), 10.1002/jrsm.5)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this