Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

R. Norman*, R. Viney, N. K. Aaronson, J. E. Brazier, D. Cella, D. S.J. Costa, P. M. Fayers, G. Kemmler, S. Peacock, A. S. Pickard, D. Rowen, D. J. Street, G. Velikova, T. A. Young, M. T. King

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as ‘Submitted’ and ‘Under Review’ However, the Reference 18 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research(2016); 25(3):625–636.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2401
Number of pages1
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Qual Life Res, (2016), 25, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this