Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

R. Norman; R. Viney; N. K. Aaronson; J. E. Brazier; D. Cella; D. S.J. Costa; P. M. Fayers; G. Kemmler; S. Peacock; A. S. Pickard; D. Rowen; D. J. Street; G. Velikova; T. A. Young; M. T. King

doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

R. Norman^*, R. Viney, N. K. Aaronson, J. E. Brazier, D. Cella, D. S.J. Costa, P. M. Fayers, G. Kemmler, S. Peacock, A. S. Pickard, D. Rowen, D. J. Street, G. Velikova, T. A. Young, M. T. King

^*Corresponding author for this work

Medical Social Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as ‘Submitted’ and ‘Under Review’. However, the Reference 10 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research (2016); 25(3):625-636. Also an error was found in Table 1 in the reported wording of the Physical Functioning item. The error and correction are described below. The error was limited to Table 1. The survey described in the paper used the correct labelling, and the validity of the analysis is therefore unaffected by the error.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2247-2248
Number of pages	2
Journal	Quality of Life Research
Volume	26
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0
State	Published - Aug 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

Cite this

Norman, R., Viney, R., Aaronson, N. K., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D., Costa, D. S. J., Fayers, P. M., Kemmler, G., Peacock, S., Pickard, A. S., Rowen, D., Street, D. J., Velikova, G., Young, T. A., & King, M. T. (2017). Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3). Quality of Life Research, 26(8), 2247-2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

@article{0d81f5dbe28d49eb8ebfcab67314bf9b,

title = "Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)",

abstract = "In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as {\textquoteleft}Submitted{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}Under Review{\textquoteright}. However, the Reference 10 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research (2016); 25(3):625-636. Also an error was found in Table 1 in the reported wording of the Physical Functioning item. The error and correction are described below. The error was limited to Table 1. The survey described in the paper used the correct labelling, and the validity of the analysis is therefore unaffected by the error.",

author = "R. Norman and R. Viney and Aaronson, {N. K.} and Brazier, {J. E.} and D. Cella and Costa, {D. S.J.} and Fayers, {P. M.} and G. Kemmler and S. Peacock and Pickard, {A. S.} and D. Rowen and Street, {D. J.} and G. Velikova and Young, {T. A.} and King, {M. T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.",

year = "2017",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "26",

pages = "2247--2248",

journal = "Quality of Life Research",

issn = "0962-9343",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "8",

}

Norman, R, Viney, R, Aaronson, NK, Brazier, JE, Cella, D, Costa, DSJ, Fayers, PM, Kemmler, G, Peacock, S, Pickard, AS, Rowen, D, Street, DJ, Velikova, G, Young, TA & King, MT 2017, 'Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)', Quality of Life Research, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2247-2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

Erratum to : Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3). / Norman, R.; Viney, R.; Aaronson, N. K. et al.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 26, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 2247-2248.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum to

T2 - Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

AU - Norman, R.

AU - Viney, R.

AU - Aaronson, N. K.

AU - Brazier, J. E.

AU - Cella, D.

AU - Costa, D. S.J.

AU - Fayers, P. M.

AU - Kemmler, G.

AU - Peacock, S.

AU - Pickard, A. S.

AU - Rowen, D.

AU - Street, D. J.

AU - Velikova, G.

AU - Young, T. A.

AU - King, M. T.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as ‘Submitted’ and ‘Under Review’. However, the Reference 10 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research (2016); 25(3):625-636. Also an error was found in Table 1 in the reported wording of the Physical Functioning item. The error and correction are described below. The error was limited to Table 1. The survey described in the paper used the correct labelling, and the validity of the analysis is therefore unaffected by the error.

AB - In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as ‘Submitted’ and ‘Under Review’. However, the Reference 10 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research (2016); 25(3):625-636. Also an error was found in Table 1 in the reported wording of the Physical Functioning item. The error and correction are described below. The error was limited to Table 1. The survey described in the paper used the correct labelling, and the validity of the analysis is therefore unaffected by the error.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015875361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015875361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

DO - 10.1007/s11136-017-1546-0

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28337638

AN - SCOPUS:85015875361

SN - 0962-9343

VL - 26

SP - 2247

EP - 2248

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

IS - 8

ER -

Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this