Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)

R. Norman*, R. Viney, N. K. Aaronson, J. E. Brazier, D. Cella, D. S.J. Costa, P. M. Fayers, G. Kemmler, S. Peacock, A. S. Pickard, D. Rowen, D. J. Street, G. Velikova, T. A. Young, M. T. King

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In this article by R. Norman et al., the article by M. T. King et al. is cited as Reference 10, as ‘Submitted’ and ‘Under Review’. However, the Reference 10 should appear with year, volume and page numbers as: King et al., Quality of Life Research (2016); 25(3):625-636. Also an error was found in Table 1 in the reported wording of the Physical Functioning item. The error and correction are described below. The error was limited to Table 1. The survey described in the paper used the correct labelling, and the validity of the analysis is therefore unaffected by the error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2247-2248
Number of pages2
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format (Quality of Life Research, (2016), 25, 3, (637-649), 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this