TY - JOUR
T1 - Esophageal Dysmotility Is Associated With Disease Severity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AU - Carlson, Dustin A.
AU - Shehata, Christina
AU - Gonsalves, Nirmala
AU - Hirano, Ikuo
AU - Peterson, Stephanie
AU - Prescott, Jacqueline
AU - Farina, Domenico A.
AU - Schauer, Jacob M.
AU - Kou, Wenjun
AU - Kahrilas, Peter J.
AU - Pandolfino, John E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 AGA Institute
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background & Aims: An association of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) with esophageal dysmotility has been described, however, the related mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate clinical and physiologic characteristics, including esophageal distensibility, associated with secondary peristalsis in patients with EoE. Methods: A total of 199 consecutive adult patients with EoE (age, 18–78 y; 32% female) who completed a 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) during endoscopy were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. FLIP panometry contractile response (CR) patterns were classified as normal CR or borderline CR if antegrade contractions were present, and abnormal CRs included impaired/disordered CR, absent CR, or spastic-reactive CR. The distensibility plateau of the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction distensibility was measured with FLIP. Results: FLIP CR patterns included 68 (34%) normal CR, 65 (33%) borderline CR, 44 (22%) impaired/disordered CR, 16 (8%) absent CR, and 6 (3%) spastic-reactive CR. Compared with normal CRs, abnormal CRs more frequently had reduced esophageal distensibility (distensibility plateau <17 mm in 56% vs 32%), greater total EoE reference scores (median, 5; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6 vs median, 4; IQR, 3–5) with more severe ring scores, and a greater duration of symptoms (median, 10 y; IQR, 4–23 y vs median, 7 y; IQR, 3–15 y). Mucosal eosinophil density, however, was similar between abnormal CRs and normal CRs (median, 34 eosinophils/high-power field [hpf]; IQR, 14–60 eosinophils/hpf vs median, 25 eosinophils/hpf; IQR, 5–50 eosinophils/hpf). Conclusions: Although normal secondary peristalsis was observed frequently in this EoE cohort, abnormal esophageal CRs were related to EoE disease severity, especially features of fibrostenosis. This study evaluating secondary peristalsis in EoE suggests that esophageal wall remodeling, rather than eosinophilic inflammatory intensity, was associated with esophageal dysmotility in EoE.
AB - Background & Aims: An association of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) with esophageal dysmotility has been described, however, the related mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate clinical and physiologic characteristics, including esophageal distensibility, associated with secondary peristalsis in patients with EoE. Methods: A total of 199 consecutive adult patients with EoE (age, 18–78 y; 32% female) who completed a 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) during endoscopy were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. FLIP panometry contractile response (CR) patterns were classified as normal CR or borderline CR if antegrade contractions were present, and abnormal CRs included impaired/disordered CR, absent CR, or spastic-reactive CR. The distensibility plateau of the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction distensibility was measured with FLIP. Results: FLIP CR patterns included 68 (34%) normal CR, 65 (33%) borderline CR, 44 (22%) impaired/disordered CR, 16 (8%) absent CR, and 6 (3%) spastic-reactive CR. Compared with normal CRs, abnormal CRs more frequently had reduced esophageal distensibility (distensibility plateau <17 mm in 56% vs 32%), greater total EoE reference scores (median, 5; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6 vs median, 4; IQR, 3–5) with more severe ring scores, and a greater duration of symptoms (median, 10 y; IQR, 4–23 y vs median, 7 y; IQR, 3–15 y). Mucosal eosinophil density, however, was similar between abnormal CRs and normal CRs (median, 34 eosinophils/high-power field [hpf]; IQR, 14–60 eosinophils/hpf vs median, 25 eosinophils/hpf; IQR, 5–50 eosinophils/hpf). Conclusions: Although normal secondary peristalsis was observed frequently in this EoE cohort, abnormal esophageal CRs were related to EoE disease severity, especially features of fibrostenosis. This study evaluating secondary peristalsis in EoE suggests that esophageal wall remodeling, rather than eosinophilic inflammatory intensity, was associated with esophageal dysmotility in EoE.
KW - Achalasia
KW - Dysphagia
KW - Esophageal Spasm
KW - Impedance
KW - Manometry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120967445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120967445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 34768010
AN - SCOPUS:85120967445
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 20
SP - 1719-1728.e3
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 8
ER -