Evaluating a Clerkship Curriculum: Description and Results

Debra A. DaRosa*, Jay B. Prystowsky, David L. Nahrwold

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Background: A comprehensive and up-to-date curriculum requires periodic formal review to ensure it continues to meet learners' needs. Purpose: This study describes a model for evaluating a surgery clerkship curriculum designed to determine the appropriateness of its learning objectives to the general professional education of a physician. Methods: A survey was mailed to graduates who pursued generalist residencies. Respondents estimated the number of patients encountered annually with specified presenting complaints or disease entities and the percentage of time these were referred to surgeons. For 23 technical procedures, respondents estimated the frequency done annually and whether remaining proficient in the skill was considered important. Results: The majority of graduates reported the need to remain proficient in 19 technical procedures. Numerous patient problems were identified as requiring careful instruction so that learners know when and when not to refer for surgical intervention. Conclusions: The clerkship was modified to include skills and topics not previously included or appropriately emphasized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating a Clerkship Curriculum: Description and Results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this